You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

doing my nut in!

edited November 2009 in Poker Chat
is there any chance that we can stop having so many threads regarding these deepstacks, everytime i come onto the forums these days all i get to see is £300 this £300 that. clearly some people must need to see the thread otherwise they would totally forget about the tournaments they normally play in? (would they really)

this is probably gonna be met my stern resistance but i think all they are doing is messing up the forum and lets be honest they dont actually get many posts on the threads themselves.

«1

Comments

  • edited November 2009
    I voted YES because a forum is about discussion and debate and if someone feels that strongly about this HE should be allowed the right to have a discussion or debate just have YOU do
  • edited November 2009
    You can always use the IGNORE facility at the bottom of peoples posts if you don't like them. 

    In my opinion these posts are usuful to both new users of the forum and those wishing to look at different types of game.
  • edited November 2009
    i think they are pretty pointless in general.  its the same 4 posters who always post, I think it is unlikely that many people are persueded to join in because of them.  once or twice when ive forgot about a tournie they reminded me however.

    however its a forum not like its running out of space, i dont care you'll get loads of people on here from that clique tho all posting the same generic response
  • edited November 2009
    Hi
    I voted that i'm not bothered, but, and dont take this the wrong way Webby, i do think it's a bit rich of you to put this thread up, given some of your past activites on the forum, but as i say everyone is entitled to their opinions.

    col
  • edited November 2009
    i dont see you playing in many of the deepstacks webby so like everyone you deserve an opinion but a lot of the regular players in these tournaments would like to see the changes imaybe you should give one a try
  • edited November 2009
    ITS UP TO EVERYBODY WHAT THEY READ AND WHAT THEY POST IF NOBODY IS INTERESTED THEY SOON DISAPEAR OF THE FRONT PAGE
  • edited November 2009
    webby  who   cares   chill     out
  • edited November 2009
    GO ON WEBBY , PLAY A DEEPIE , I DARE YOU
  • edited November 2009
    Not really fussed is what i voted ;) if i aint interested buddy i don't read it .... sorry mate ;)
  • edited November 2009
    I think it is a great job the guys do in promoting the deepies.

    I have no doubt, without them, the deepies would have died a slow and painful death. Being a slow burner, it does take a certain player/mentality to enjoy them as too many casual gamers come for the quick fix the faster paced structures give.

    I love the odd deepie, unfortunately, I rarely have the 4 hours to spare.

    The biggest issue at the moment is to do with the amount of new threads at the moment. Sometimes 20 or 30 in a day, with some of the most rediculous, tedious subjects ever.

    Most decent threads now only get the benefit of an hour or two on page one, this means it is lost to the archives before the discussion has truly run it's course.

    This also means a few days later, a similar thread is started by someone else. This then becomes an ever decreasing circle of quicker and quicker new threads and threads being lost to the vaults.

    I have started spending a little more time over in the shed and poker strategy than usual, at least a thread can last a week or more over there.

    If Sky limited each person to one new thread a week, this problem would be eliminated overnight.

    In the meantime, guys, if you want to start a new thread, do have a look over some of the older pages, just to see if it has been discussed over the last couple of hours.

    I didn't read in the rules of the posters freeroll that you had bonus points for starting a new thread.
  • edited November 2009
    Carry on the guys giving us reminders although yesterday was a bit much, the forum was choc a block with them
  • edited November 2009
    i voted yes,

     and yes people are entitled to put up what they want on the forum,

    if sky don't like it they take it down ,

    webby me thinks you are looking to become the doorman in this forum of ours,

    its for us all .


  • edited November 2009
    In Response to Re: doing my nut in!:
    I think it is a great job the guys do in promoting the deepies. I have no doubt, without them, the deepies would have died a slow and painful death. Being a slow burner, it does take a certain player/mentality to enjoy them as too many casual gamers come for the quick fix the faster paced structures give. I love the odd deepie, unfortunately, I rarely have the 4 hours to spare. The biggest issue at the moment is to do with the amount of new threads at the moment. Sometimes 20 or 30 in a day, with some of the most rediculous, tedious subjects ever. Most decent threads now only get the benefit of an hour or two on page one, this means it is lost to the archives before the discussion has truly run it's course. This also means a few days later, a similar thread is started by someone else. This then becomes an ever decreasing circle of quicker and quicker new threads and threads being lost to the vaults. I have started spending a little more time over in the shed and poker strategy than usual, at least a thread can last a week or more over there. If Sky limited each person to one new thread a week, this problem would be eliminated overnight. In the meantime, guys, if you want to start a new thread, do have a look over some of the older pages, just to see if it has been discussed over the last couple of hours. I didn't read in the rules of the posters freeroll that you had bonus points for starting a new thread.
    Posted by Hale72
    Yeh right, you lady's do nothing all day except watch TV and play poker lol
    Also im gonna start a thread on wether we should get bonus points for starting a thread.
  • edited November 2009
    In Response to Re: doing my nut in!:
    GO ON WEBBY , PLAY A DEEPIE , I DARE YOU
    Posted by PILLOWMAN
    How could he turn a dare down from pillowman
  • edited November 2009
    In Response to Re: doing my nut in!:
    In Response to Re: doing my nut in! : How could he turn a dare down from pillowman
    Posted by Ozzie08
    RUSSIAN ROULETTE FOR YOU , I DARE YOU
  • edited November 2009
    In Response to Re: doing my nut in!:
    In Response to Re: doing my nut in! : Yeh right, you lady's do nothing all day except watch TV and play poker lol Also im gonna start a thread on wether we should get bonus points for starting a thread.
    Posted by loonytoons
    I wish!!!!!!!!

    The only T.V. I ever watch is playhouse Disney, and did you not read my 'halestorm' blog?

    I have only played 2 DYM's all day, with little chance for a third.

    Another point I raised earlier, we now have 2 luck based threads on page one and the poor thread about to be relegated to the Scottish third division that is page 2 was last used only just over an hour ago.

    There is also a thread on page 3 that was only started this morning.
  • edited November 2009
    life is too short to get fussed either way. If people want to talk about then fine by me - go on have a blast.
  • edited November 2009
    Anyway ...i do like old tractors...is that helpfull!

  • edited November 2009
    "about to be relegated to the Scottish third division that is page 2"

    Fantastic comment Hayley, although surely you have gone over the score here!  No post is so bad that it should be mentioned in the same breath as the scottish third division.

    But on a serious note, as a forum, we should really look at the number of threads that are being created.  If a thread was created this morning, and is now on the third page, then we are looking at something in the region of 30 new threads in a day.  can there really be thirty different new topics to discuss in such a short space of time?

    For me, the answer is "no", but we all know that similar threads appear on a regular basis.  New members to the forum post topics that have been debated previously.  We need to accept that this happens and be tolerant of new posters.  I did the same thing when i first joined the community.

    Rich has asked for ideas to freshen up the forum (it's probably on page 6 now lol) and people have contributed varying ideas.  Hopefully the best of these will be implemented and this will help to keep the best threads alive  for longer.

    In the meantime, posters can start any thread they like, and the rest of us can choose to ignore, read and ignore, or read and respond to it.
  • edited November 2009
    At the moment you cant choose to ignore because its still there, i suggested that we have a thread hide button so we could hide the ones we have, or no longer have any interest in. 2 weeks ago when i came to sit down after work, i only had to go 1/2 way down page 2 of the forum to view threads from last night, now its near 4 pages.
  • edited November 2009

    i think they try to persuade people to at least give these a go because they offer great value and play,nowt wrong with that.

    long live the deeeepppppiiiieeesss

  • edited November 2009
    For me, the answer is "no", but we all know that similar threads appear on a regular basis.  New members to the forum post topics that have been debated previously.  We need to accept that this happens and be tolerant of new posters.  I did the same thing when i first joined the community.


    Yes, this is just part and parcel of the forum. I have no real issues here and new posters do genuinly ask questions they did not see a few weeks ago or want advice on something previously covered.

    It's the huge amount of pap at the moment and the same subject being covered at the same time.

    2 threads about how luck is relevant to your game, both on page one? Is this really necessary?
  • edited November 2009
    Hi hayley

    I understand what you are saying, and cannot argue with you on that one.  That is why i think the thread that rich has started asking for recommendations for changing the set up of the forum is an important one.  If we get this right, then it could be a lot easier to see the threads that tend to be of interest to us, and avoid having duplicate threads so close together.

    Loony's idea of hiding threads that are not of interest is a good one, if it is practical. 

    Along the same idea, I think you can follow threads that are of particular interest and see them in your profile page, so that even if they drop off the top page, you can quickly see if anyone has added to them since you were last on the site.
  • edited November 2009
    not really bothered if people want to post them they can
  • edited November 2009
    I follow most threads, really that would be impractical.

    Hopefully, the 'new thread' boom will quieten down soon enough and things will get back to normal.

    I spend half my day trying to catch up sometimes. I really need to play some poker soon!!!

    Can Webby do a sponsored 'no new threads' for children in need. It would earn them a few quid, and we can see if he gets withdrawl symptoms as well!

    Put me down for a quid to start the ball rolling!
  • edited November 2009
  • edited November 2009
    In Response to Re: doing my nut in!:
    i dont care
    Posted by namesb0nd
    Bet you will if those keep getting you in the posters freebie!
  • edited November 2009

    I don't read them and i don't know why they are posted. each to their own as to the things they post though. As long as the regular deppie players want to put threads up then why not, i just won't bother to read them. As far as promoting the deepstacks go though i don't see many new people signing up to these ever so i don't think the threads create interest in them. It took me a while to figure out that the main guys posting them were not on the sky payroll, i just figured no one would bother with an "advertising" thread if they wern't employed by the site but obviously these tournys are important to some people, even if they don't play in them themselves

  • edited November 2009
    In Response to Re: doing my nut in!:
    I don't read them and i don't know why they are posted. each to their own as to the things they post though. As long as the regular deppie players want to put threads up then why not, i just won't bother to read them. As far as promoting the deepstacks go though i don't see many new people signing up to these ever so i don't think the threads create interest in them. It took me a while to figure out that the main guys posting them were not on the sky payroll, i just figured no one would bother with an "advertising" thread if they wern't employed by the site but obviously these tournys are important to some people, even if they don't play in them themselves
    Posted by NICON
    Hi Nicon

    The threads were started by tikay, and still does them too when hes on the forum :)
  • edited November 2009
    in my view people can promote what ever sky poker tournie they want on this forum. If you dont want to read it, please dont.

    tikay, barry, kiwi and others have done great to promote the deepstacks and i find the posts a helpful reminder sometimes to register...

    If you want to promote the 60p Roulette every night, be my guest... I wont be interested, but i wont mock those that promote it.

    The forum is for whatever we chose it to be.. start a thread on whatever you like imo.


Sign In or Register to comment.