Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
this promo should of been done in a format of league points, not poker points. only the high rollers will get into the top 6 so not done on a fair playing field imo.
0 ·
Comments
I think the final will have a mix of mid stakes and high stakes regs. I do think it will be hard for the lower stake regs to get in, although not impossible.
Assuming he's still putting in the volume he used to, I'm pretty sure WrongJohn is guaranteed a place because he is a massive sicko and I'm pretty sure he isn't a 'high roller' in terms of the stakes he chooses to play. Could be wrong but I'm sure he plays like medium stakes like £11s
I'm not sure where all this dislike for the promo is coming from. You cannot expect to play the same amount of games you always have and just wander into the final. The first thing I did was to dramatically increase the ranges of games I register for. I'm not saying you should play higher, but I think anyone serious about going for this needs to play the lower games as well as their usual and play longer sessions.
Top grinders rewarded well as always and draw which i sure will be done fair for the rest to look forward to.
BTW I'm playing everything £11+ so I should have a fair idea of some of the people who have gone for it and will hope to see them in the final. Along with myself.
So they could be earning 144 per hour (roughly), so do that for 3 hours for 7 days and you got 3k points in 1 week. Sure that's a hell of a grind but it's only for a week, and if it gives you somewhere between £100 and £1000, it's worth it if you have the time.
It's not gonna be easy for low stakes players, but considering getting in it is a guaranteed £100 minimum and possibly £1000 if you take it down, it shouldn't be easy. If I was a DYM grinder, I'd certainly be giving it a go, but I'm not so yeah.
It's totally geared towards multi table grinders especially high level ones.
If this is what sky thinks is a good idea they need to think again.All of the top places will be taken by players playing there normal multi table grinds.
Why not have a minimum number of games and highest ROI's or win rates over that period get the invite. It wouldn't be difficult to do and would see some different names on the tables too. For people who are beating say DYM's, i'd prefer to see a shoot out with the 'best' ones NOT the ones who just play the most. You could start by taking the name CHAMP off the promotion and maybe call it '8TABLESATATIME' or is that too many letters? HAHA...
A little more imagination please MR SKY for players on your site who haven't the cash/time to multi table for 6 hours a day. Spread the promotions out throughout your volume levels or they will receive resentment and alienation from players who think you are ignoring them.
I was considering playing 6x£3.30 dym's a night this week instead of 5 but i'm not going to now as a token gesture...LOL(last bit was in tongue in cheek guys so no silly replies to it please eh, but the rest is my honest view)
I applaude sky for trying to do something for the sng players but if this was to run again then a different structure would mean the best 6 sng players make the final 6 and not just the 6 highest rake makers.
I wish everyone who is trying to make the final 6 the best of luck, I am in the middle of a challenge of my own so wont be stepping up to higher stakes to fight for one of those places.
May be a bad idea, and would need some tweaking, but the winner of this would have more of a claim to being sit and go champ and would also be more of a laugh imo....
i think sit and go champ should be the person with the biggest win rate not the biggest bankroll.
I'd like to see the numbers of low level players in it at the end. They certainly won't be the ones with highest win rates a if they are, then only by coincidence. There are grinders switching to this even though its not their regular game as they know that their volume will be enough to qualify regardless of results. How can that be the criteria for a competition? It doesn'tmake sense and everybody reaing the promotion surely understands this.
Could Sky not introduce something where good results over a period provide a table tournament so that good players with lowver volume or smaller BR's but higher win rates can fight with the BIG boys and not let it be cash dependent? I got a free entry for the Roller for winning the overall monthly DTd. Now £110 is well out of my range for entries but playing with MattBates and Saradog (who won it) as well as a silver star winner etc really gave me a buzz as well as making me realise how much i've to learn. It was an experience and one which will make me play more in the future. Surely thats the aim of a promotion.
Personally, i'd rather see a table playing with players who'd won say 75% of games in a week after a prescribed number of games specified by SKY, maybe, than amassing a trillion points and qualifying that way. I'd feel that i could then possibly glean something from play which has been successful under the criteria.