You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client

I asked about a month ago if the download version would be compatible with these programs and the tech guys said it was slightly too early to tell if it would. Was just wondering if this has advanced any since that time and if they now have an aswer as to weather or not we will be able to use them?

Cheers

Chris

* If you could ask again for me sky rich then i would be most grateful. This is a deciding factor for me as to weather or not to roll up properly for cash games on sky or just carry on playing little bits here and there as when i fancy.
«1

Comments

  • edited January 2010
    No problem. i'll send this back over to the guys.
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    I asked about a month ago if the download version would be compatible with these programs and the tech guys said it was slightly too early to tell if it would. Was just wondering if this has advanced any since that time and if they now have an aswer as to weather or not we will be able to use them? Cheers Chris * If you could ask again for me sky rich then i would be most grateful. This is a deciding factor for me as to weather or not to roll up properly for cash games on sky or just carry on playing little bits here and there as when i fancy.
    Posted by ACESOVER8s
    Hi Chris,

    This area of the download client has not yet been finalised and there are many factors to consider, therefore there is no answer to your query as of yet.


    The Integration of PT3, PO, HEM etc software has been well debated on here before, there are players who sit on either side of the fence and we will not be making a decision lightly.

    I understand that this is an important question for you and many other players, as soon as we have an answer we will make it clear to you and the rest of the Sky Poker community.

    Kind Regards

    Adam
  • edited January 2010
    Thanks Rich & Adam,

    A speedy response to my question and although it doesn't settle the matter i do understand its not an easy proposition (due to people who don't want them on here) and also if the web browser versions, TV versions etc will all run alongside each other i presume there would be a mountain of technical issues.

    I look forward to further news and would like to thank you both for taking the time to deal

    Cheers

    Chris
  • edited January 2010
    would be great to see it as i have never tried it myself and think it looks great.I understand that it would be a large task to undertake,but it would be great :)
  • edited January 2010
    This is a deciding factor for me as to weather or not to roll up properly for cash games on sky or just carry on playing little bits here and there as when i fancy.
    Posted by ACESOVER8s
    What's the WEATHER got to do with it? ;o)


    I personally believe that such "helper" programs have spoiled online poker and it is borderline cheating. Poker is meant to be a skill game and as such, we should all be on a level playing field. I feel that players should try to improve their OWN game rather than turning to 3rd party software to gain an advantage. If everyone is going to use software to make a decision, then you may as well turn the poker site into a casino.
  • edited January 2010
    It is not using software to make a decision.
    A tool like PT3 merely stores hands in an easily accessible format and allows players to improve their play by analysing their, and their opponent's play.
    All the information is already available on SkyPoker.
    All that we are requesting is that this information is recorded in a format that can be imported into a useful analytical tool.
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    What's the WEATHER got to do with it? ;o) I personally believe that such "helper" programs have spoiled online poker and it is borderline cheating. Poker is meant to be a skill game and as such, we should all be on a level playing field. I feel that players should try to improve their OWN game rather than turning to 3rd party software to gain an advantage. If everyone is going to use software to make a decision, then you may as well turn the poker site into a casino.
    Posted by FishingPhi
    I Find on the whole that people who comment back against tracker programs in the manner you have done will have little to no experiance of the programs and somehow assume that the program plays the game for you. It tracks play, records hands and allows you to identify weakness in your game and eliminate it. Your statement highlighted above is EXACTLY the reason i would use a tracker on this site don't you see that??? how do you spot where your game has gone off track? do yo uknow if you 3 bet too little or too much against certain players? are you constantly dripping money away by SB on BB raises??? i'll bet you don't have the data to answer those questions and do you know why????? Yep because for problems like these you probably wouldn't notice them unless you had tracked them !!!! (P.S you get 3 brownie points if you guessed the answer to that)

    It's not about cheating, the program doesn't show you what your opponent is holding or what's coming on the flop. It just records what has already occured. This could be done on a spread sheet but you would spend more time typing than playing so it's not really worth it..... Kinda like i could walk to John o'Groats but it would be a bit quicker to take a car wouldn't it, not cheating just using technology available as we don't live in the 1700's
  • edited January 2010
    It is not using software to make a decision. A tool like PT3 merely stores hands in an easily accessible format and allows players to improve their play by analysing their, and their opponent's play. All the information is already available on SkyPoker. All that we are requesting is that this information is recorded in a format that can be imported into a useful analytical tool.
    Posted by MereNovice
    So why do you need more software? Seriously though, programs like PT will give you EVERY possible statistic on your opponents. Statistics like % flops seen, check/raise %, hourly rates, etc, etc, all shown in a nice HUD. You could never work all that out in your head and that is why i feel that it is not proper poker. But i guess that's what happens when money games meet the internet - there's always someone trying to go one better.

    Don't get me wrong, i don't disagree with such tools as long as everyone uses the same, or at least you can visibly see when an opponent is using some sort of tracking or profiling software against you. Nobody can deny that using such software gives users an advantage. Whether that is fair or unfair is another debate.
  • edited January 2010
    Fishing, it will give an advantage but it's no different to playing football in a pair of old work boots or a pair of Top Class football boots. You CAN play in old steel toe caps if you want but it's a better idea to wear a good pair of football boots as it helps you focus your skill. That doesn't mean that if you put me in a pair of Addidas Preditors and Beckham in the steel toe caps that i'm going to be better than him. Lets face it, he's still going to kick my preverbial isn't he
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    So why do you need more software? Seriously though, programs like PT will give you EVERY possible statistic on your opponents. Statistics like % flops seen, check/raise %, hourly rates, etc, etc, all shown in a nice HUD. You could never work all that out in your head and that is why i feel that it is not proper poker. But i guess that's what happens when money games meet the internet - there's always someone trying to go one better. Don't get me wrong, i don't disagree with such tools as long as everyone uses the same, or at least you can visibly see when an opponent is using some sort of tracking or profiling software against you. Nobody can deny that using such software gives users an advantage. Whether that is fair or unfair is another debate.
    Posted by FishingPhi
    The response to this is simple. The current format of the info doesn't lend itself to being able to store or review properly. If the HH was extractable then you can really look at what your doing with your game through one of the aforementioned programs
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    So why do you need more software? Seriously though, programs like PT will give you EVERY possible statistic on your opponents. Statistics like % flops seen, check/raise %, hourly rates, etc, etc, all shown in a nice HUD. You could never work all that out in your head and that is why i feel that it is not proper poker. But i guess that's what happens when money games meet the internet - there's always someone trying to go one better. Don't get me wrong, i don't disagree with such tools as long as everyone uses the same, or at least you can visibly see when an opponent is using some sort of tracking or profiling software against you. Nobody can deny that using such software gives users an advantage. Whether that is fair or unfair is another debate.
    Posted by FishingPhi
    I don't need the software - I choose to use it where available since it helps improve my game. Everyone else has the option to use the same software.
    The tool only provides information on opponents for hands played at tables where you are both participating since these are the only hands available to be imported.
    While I cannot work this information out "in my head" I can assure you that given enough resources I could work it out on a spreadsheet or write the equivalent software myself.
    PT3 has no "real time" component - it does not interact with a player at the table, it merely provides analysis that be viewed away from the table.
    I am certainly not accusing you of this but there appears to be a high level of paranoia about tools like this based on a lack of understanding of how the tools work. People often fear what they cannot understand.
  • edited January 2010
    I do not want to start a slanging match. I have used both PokerTracker and PokerOffice in the past and numerous other "helper" programs such as Poker Sherlock. Even Sharkscope is slightly unethical IMO (pokerstars have banned it) but we are forced to use these tools if we want to keep up with the competition. Most of them help the user with table selection and have a HUD and also have add-ons for features such as live odds calculators and (quoted from the first feature mentioned on the P.O. website) "Real time opponent statistics and betting patterns". So what if someone c-bets too often or doesn't check/raise enough? Poker is supposed to be about personalities and individual playing styles, not some statistically perfect strategy.

    My point was that it would make a refreshing change to have a poker site where these type of programs were completely banned or at least had to be publicly declared. I mean something a bit closer to "traditional" poker where we use only what we have between our ears. Easier said than done, i know, as there will always be someone trying to take advantage of others. In reality, there's no getting away from such things on the 'net. In the "old days" we had to do our own homework and fix leaks in our game by making some costly mistakes and then thinking "hmmmm, that was a bad idea". If you lose a few quid, you soon discover your leaks.

    I guess the only way to avoid these kind of disadvantages is to do as others do or simply avoid playing on the 'net alltogether.
  • edited January 2010
    Pokerstars have not banned sharkscope. It is simply optional to be listed or not. I agree it's not about getting into a slanging match but there are certain words used in your first post that cast a light upon someone like myself who would like the download client to accept them. Words like "Cheating". Not a personal attack on me i understand but for those that read the forum and don't understand what these software packages are they take one look at words like that and jump on the bandwagon.

    The Hud aspects of trackers are feeding back info on the hands they collect. They are not predicting the future. They are not commenting on every player as they only have info on those you have played. You would have to have hundreds of hands against any one player for the info to even become relevant. I'm not overly bothered by the HUD part of the tracker if i'm playing one table, i will note if someone always C-Bets or constantly folds to the C-Bet. However if i'm playing 8 tables then it's a little more difficult. If i play live do i need a tracker .... no but then i'm not involved i 8 different games live and running from table to table.

    Online isn't live, cash games are played multitable and although you may have the skill for the game to pick up the reads, your attention is more divided and for that the hud can be useful
  • edited January 2010
    So can you use HEM on Sky now?

    I'm watching Mastercash and they are quoting stats in some of the problems?

    Seriously, if you want more people to play Sky then HEM is a requirement for the site as if you use it to improve your play, you don't want your own stats messed up by playing on sites not using it, reducing the sample size.
  • edited January 2010
    I think its great sky does not allow this software, part of poker is analysing your opponents therefore having this software takes an element of skill out of the game. Also software like this puts many people off playing online poker.

    I am happy playing at Sky, however if Sky did enable this software I would most probably move sites along with a lot of others who share similar views to me.

    Sky should advertise the fact they do not allow tracking software, this would attract a lot of players to the site, I dont know why there marketing department has not thought of this already.

    PS I have used PT HEM and PO before on other sites.
  • edited January 2010
    I really don't follow the logic of this at all.
    Effectively all these tools do is aggregate, organise and present information that it is already available on the website.
    They are labour-saving devices, nothing more.

    They do not magically give you insight into your opponent's play; they just provide statistical information that you could work out for yourself manually if you had the inclination.

    I make copious notes on my opponents. I do not regard this as a "skill". It is just a requirement because tools like PT are not compatible with SkyPoker currently.
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    I think its great sky does not allow this software, part of poker is analysing your opponents therefore having this software takes an element of skill out of the game. Also software like this puts many people off playing online poker. I am happy playing at Sky, however if Sky did enable this software I would most probably move sites along with a lot of others who share similar views to me. Sky should advertise the fact they do not allow tracking software, this would attract a lot of players to the site, I dont know why there marketing department has not thought of this already. PS I have used PT HEM and PO before on other sites.
    Posted by ajs4385
    I get that some people don't like them because they believe they give unfair advantage (which is wrong but i get it). No "Unfair" advantage is gained as A) The software is available to all who want it and B) people are incorrectly assuming that these things tell you what to play and when.

    I don't get how someone who has used them on other sites (And is obviously a very experianced and quality player like yourself AJS) would refuse to play on a site that accepted them? if you have used then you know what they are about and at the stakes you play i would think you would welcome the statistical info they can provided you with on your own game?

    Would i be right in thinking that the fish you feed off would improve a little to quickly for your liking with these programs available AJS ???? lol

    On a serious note - I would like to see them introduced with the downloadable client as i have many holes in my game here that could do with fixing lol but if there not then i'll continue to play here for fun and play elsewhere for the main of my roll.

    People have a slightly idealised view of why there not currently available to use here, it's not to prevent cheating or unfair advantage, there is no moral highground that sky had taken here, it's just their software can't do it.

    If they want to use the lack of tracking software use on SKY as a USP then good luck to them but i'd bet that the numbers are reasonably similar in those that do want them to those that don't
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    Effectively all these tools do is aggregate, organise and present information that it is already available on the website. They are labour-saving devices, nothing more.
    Posted by MereNovice
    Not quite right, because what they do is process the information and present in real-time, making it more accessible to you than it would be if you were just making manual notes and obviously far more comprehensive. That new and more readily available information could alter your decision making in marginal spots. In that sense, it enhances your play as well as reducing your labour.


  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client : Not quite right, because what they do is process the information and present in real-time, making it more accessible to you than it would be if you were just making manual notes and obviously far more comprehensive. That new and more readily available information could alter your decision making in marginal spots. In that sense, it enhances your play as well as reducing your labour.
    Posted by Sky_Dave
    Hmmmmm....... Understand what your saying Dave but the HUD collects the info and presents it. You still have to make your own call on what to do with that info, as such would you not agree that the hud gives YOU the ability to enhance your game rather than does it for you?

    I'm in agreement that the software helps you play better (or why else would i want the site to be compatable with them) but not because it's making your decisions and playing for you (which seems to be some peoples view on these things) but because it can provide the info you need to improve your game.

    I guess we'll know soon enough which way sky have gone on this, and like i say i'll have no worries either way (so don't go expecting any I'm off threads in the near future lol) but i do hope they become available to use on here as i'd like to play more cash here.

    You don't offer an opinion on them Dave? Do you use them at other sites? do you like them? or do you consider them an unfair advantage to those not using them? (if your allowed to offer a view as an employee)
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    I really don't follow the logic of this at all. Effectively all these tools do is aggregate, organise and present information that it is already available on the website. They are labour-saving devices, nothing more. They do not magically give you insight into your opponent's play; they just provide statistical information that you could work out for yourself manually if you had the inclination. I make copious notes on my opponents. I do not regard this as a "skill". It is just a requirement because tools like PT are not compatible with SkyPoker currently.
    Posted by MereNovice

    OK, Ive used pt and po on most other sites and it is a good tool.   For analysing ur own game it is excellent, but lets be honest with ourselves.  The reason I use it is to see what my oppo`s are doing.  When multitabling, it is difficult to make notes so pt/po/hem basically do it for you and more.

    Merenovice and others who say it is not cheating. 

    Steroids are banned from sport as they are an aid. poker tracker is brain steroids.  It is super human.  No human could possibly keep track of realtime stats in their head 12 tabling.  Unless you are rain man of course.

    Personally, I would HATE to see sky allow tracking software.  This is one of the last sanctuarys left
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client : Hmmmmm....... Understand what your saying Dave but the HUD collects the info and presents it. You still have to make your own call on what to do with that info, as such would you not agree that the hud gives YOU the ability to enhance your game rather than does it for you? I'm in agreement that the software helps you play better (or why else would i want the site to be compatable with them) but not because it's making your decisions and playing for you (which seems to be some peoples view on these things) but because it can provide the info you need to improve your game. I guess we'll know soon enough which way sky have gone on this, and like i say i'll have no worries either way (so don't go expecting any I'm off threads in the near future lol) but i do hope they become available to use on here as i'd like to play more cash here. You don't offer an opinion on them Dave? Do you use them at other sites? do you like them? or do you consider them an unfair advantage to those not using them? (if your allowed to offer a view as an employee)
    Posted by ACESOVER8s

    Aces,

    I'm always able to offer an opinion, so long as people are always aware that these are *my* views and not always those of Sky Poker as a business/group/bunch of lovely people, etc. There's the disclaimer out of the way, so let me get stuck in here...

    While you're spot on that the HUD collects and presents information, it's the end result of that presentation that 'enhances' your play. If you know from a guy's HUD stats that he's incapable of firing a third bullet without the nuts, you may well get away from hands that you would have called with otherwise. 

    If we take the steroid analogy that was used earlier in the thread, all steroids do is build your body up to be more able. You still have to put one leg in front of the other and *do* the running, in the same way you still have to press the buttons in online poker. What both steroids and something like PT or HEM allow you to do is make those actions more effectively.

    As for my personal opinion on use of PT3 and HEM, I am actually in favour of it. I think it brings a new skill set to the table, namely being able to process that extra data and apply it in a game situation. However, I am also very sympathetic to those who think it is only one step away from cheating. It does give you an edge which some of your opponents don't have, but I believe that as long as all players are aware that the software is permitted on the site (if not encouraged), it is down to the individual player to then decide if they're happy playing against people who could be using them or if they want to move to one of those sites which doesnt' support them.

    In an ideal world I believe there should be a mix - some sites that do endorse them and others which want to stay truer to the organic poker experience. I agree that NOT allowing them is a strong selling point for some players, but conversely some others might not come to the site if they feel they're having to play a bit 'behind the times'. Different strokes for different folks.

    That's my 2c worth on it, and do remember that this is just my take on the issue and not an official line on it at all. What I can say is that people like Des, Bernie and Adam work hard and believe in their product more than many, many people I have seen in this industry. They'll not make this decision lightly.



  • edited January 2010
    Cheers for the views Dave,

    and i also understand there are people that don't like playing against them and this could be used as a USP for the site. Like i say i'll live either way the decision goes. It only has a bearing on the type of poker i play here and the frequency. At the moment this is a fun site for me. To commit to cash grinding here i would really want this available but i'll play a few quid here and there on the site no matter what.

    Up to this point the lack of trakers has been purely a technical issue and as such not one i suppose that the powers that be have had to concern themselves with. The downloadable client obviously throws up what i'm sure is a very controversial decision for the company and one that i am also certain will define the cash & tournie play on the site.

    I have a feeling my views may come out on the loseing side of this debate. The "Image" of SKY as a site for fun poker may win out, but what ever they decide I hope the answer (and the client) materialise quickly lol
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    Cheers for the views Dave, and i also understand there are people that don't like playing against them and this could be used as a USP for the site. Like i say i'll live either way the decision goes. It only has a bearing on the type of poker i play here and the frequency. At the moment this is a fun site for me. To commit to cash grinding here i would really want this available but i'll play a few quid here and there on the site no matter what. Up to this point the lack of trakers has been purely a technical issue and as such not one i suppose that the powers that be have had to concern themselves with. The downloadable client obviously throws up what i'm sure is a very controversial decision for the company and one that i am also certain will define the cash & tournie play on the site. I have a feeling my views may come out on the loseing side of this debate. The "Image" of SKY as a site for fun poker may win out, but what ever they decide I hope the answer (and the client) materialise quickly lol
    Posted by ACESOVER8s
    I have a feeling that your views will come out on the winning side aces.

    Even though I am against having tracker compatability, I think it will be implemented sooner or later as I think the traffic will increase when it does.
    I am under no illusions here, and when/if it comes into practice I fully expect my winrate to dip significantly and  have no reservations admitting that.  Even though I will be using pt myself.

    I dont think I am alone here either, and most of the others who dont want pt is for the same reason.  There are ppl who have posted on this thread who have mastered multitabling with no tracker support, so why would they want ppl coming along who are basically better `statistics analysts` than them.

    I think there are many ppl who would leave this site if pt came into use, but I think more ppl would sign up to outweigh it.

    That is of course if `cash for points` was seriously overhauled to bring it in line with competitors.
  • edited January 2010
    I think that may actually be key. If the cash for points system can't compete with rake back deals, then is the introduction of PT3 compatability actualy going to bring in the big rakers for cash play?

    I think if SKY weigh it up and decide not to restructure Cash for points then they may also decide that high rake players who survive off that type of thing are not their target market, thus leaving the site a Fun Zone and no need to bring the trackers in.

    Ah well only a month or 2 until launch of the software so we will know by then i guess
  • edited January 2010

    Holdem manager does not tell you what to do, it will not make decisions for you, It will not make you into a winning player, it simply provides stats and allows you to make a decision based upon them.

    such stats are:

    The percentage of hands a player is playing
    How often does he/she fold to a c-bet
    how often does he/she fold to a steal


    All the above info you could get yourself just by watching the table and making notes.

    I don't see why people have a problem with it especially when the software is there for everyone to use.

    I would also like to mention that this software is pretty much useless for things like mtt's and sng's because of the blind structure and the fact that people play differently depending on their stack to blind ratio.

    Salazar

  • edited January 2010
    `Holdem manager does not tell you what to do, it will not make decisions for you, It will not make you into a winning player, it simply provides stats and allows you to make a decision based upon them.`

    Debatable.

    If a 63/58/4.5 open shoves pre and you are holding AK, you are instacalling. 

    If a 5/4/3 open shoves pre and you hold AK, you are instafolding.

    There may not be a voice or text actually telling you what decision to make but its the same thing.

    It is only a tiny step away from being a bot.
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    `Holdem manager does not tell you what to do, it will not make decisions for you, It will not make you into a winning player, it simply provides stats and allows you to make a decision based upon them.` Debatable. If a 63/58/4.5 open shoves pre and you are holding AK, you are instacalling.  If a 5/4/3 open shoves pre and you hold AK, you are instafolding. There may not be a voice or text actually telling you what decision to make but its the same thing. It is only a tiny step away from being a bot.
    Posted by OMahonyO

    I understand what you're saying but the 2 sets of stats that you give are at each end of the scale and to be honest with you, you wouldn't need HEM to tell you that one guy is playing like a maniac and the other hasn't played a hand since last week.


    Salazar
  • edited January 2010
    Tracking software puts off recreational (losing) players as they believe it is cheating, they want privacy on thier gambling losses and want to play on a level playing field. POKER INDUSTRY RELIES ON LOSING PLAYERS, they are more important than any multi tabling reg even though they pay more in rake. You might not think this at first but look at ipoker for an example, they offered silly rake back deals to loads of winning players, in the short term it helped the network grow but they have come to realise that silly rake back deals and having a site full of multi tabling bots relying on both huds and rakeback is not good for the industry in the long term. Ipoker are now shutting down skins who have too many winning players and therefore there is a british bookmaker who have actually banned winning regs from playing on their skin so that they take in more than they pay out. Poker needs casual players having a bit of fun, huds make regs play better and therefore they will take the casual players money quicker, the casual player gets fed up of hardly winning and stops playing.

    So sky I see you have 2 choices

    1) Enable tracking software get into a rakeback war and attract more regs, you will see a short term increase in volume (not always profit as these nits will constantly pass the blinds round pots will small and therefore rake will be.) These players will stop a couple of months and then go to the next place offering a good rb deal.

    2) Dont allow rakeback or tracking software, Invest in marketing and attract casual players who play for fun, without people willing to spend there is no industry. Attracting these players by advertising the fact there is no tracking software on sky and by investing in marketing will ensure the long term prospects of the site and profits will be greater as pots are bigger. Also no need to give half of your income back to these players.

    From a personal point of view tracking software will see my winnings grow in the short term as my edge will be greater and I would love to see 55% rakeback that I have at a Ipoker skin as again my short term profits will grow. However, I dont want to see these changes implemented as it is not good for the long term of the poker industry.

    I dont know what sky's plans are for the future but I hope they seriously think about what they are wanting to achieve in the long term.
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    Tracking software puts off recreational (losing) players as they believe it is cheating, they want privacy on thier gambling losses and want to play on a level playing field. POKER INDUSTRY RELIES ON LOSING PLAYERS, they are more important than any multi tabling reg even though they pay more in rake. You might not think this at first but look at ipoker for an example, they offered silly rake back deals to loads of winning players, in the short term it helped the network grow but they have come to realise that silly rake back deals and having a site full of multi tabling bots relying on both huds and rakeback is not good for the industry in the long term. Ipoker are now shutting down skins who have too many winning players and therefore there is a british bookmaker who have actually banned winning regs from playing on their skin so that they take in more than they pay out. Poker needs casual players having a bit of fun, huds make regs play better and therefore they will take the casual players money quicker, the casual player gets fed up of hardly winning and stops playing. So sky I see you have 2 choices 1) Enable tracking software get into a rakeback war and attract more regs, you will see a short term increase in volume (not always profit as these nits will constantly pass the blinds round pots will small and therefore rake will be.) These players will stop a couple of months and then go to the next place offering a good rb deal. 2) Dont allow rakeback or tracking software, Invest in marketing and attract casual players who play for fun, without people willing to spend there is no industry. Attracting these players by advertising the fact there is no tracking software on sky and by investing in marketing will ensure the long term prospects of the site and profits will be greater as pots are bigger. Also no need to give half of your income back to these players. From a personal point of view tracking software will see my winnings grow in the short term as my edge will be greater and I would love to see 55% rakeback that I have at a Ipoker skin as again my short term profits will grow. However, I dont want to see these changes implemented as it is not good for the long term of the poker industry. I dont know what sky's plans are for the future but I hope they seriously think about what they are wanting to achieve in the long term.
    Posted by ajs4385
    this makes sense.

    I`m not sure they would advertise the fact that sky doesnt allow tracking software though.  They would want to keep their options open for the future.  Advertising no pt etc is effectively closing that door as they would be slammed if they reversed their decision.

    55% rb? is that with plex?
  • edited January 2010
    In Response to Re: Compatability OF PT3 & HEM with Skys Downloadable Client:
    Tracking software puts off recreational (losing) players as they believe it is cheating, they want privacy on thier gambling losses and want to play on a level playing field. POKER INDUSTRY RELIES ON LOSING PLAYERS, they are more important than any multi tabling reg even though they pay more in rake. You might not think this at first but look at ipoker for an example, they offered silly rake back deals to loads of winning players, in the short term it helped the network grow but they have come to realise that silly rake back deals and having a site full of multi tabling bots relying on both huds and rakeback is not good for the industry in the long term. Ipoker are now shutting down skins who have too many winning players and therefore there is a british bookmaker who have actually banned winning regs from playing on their skin so that they take in more than they pay out. Poker needs casual players having a bit of fun, huds make regs play better and therefore they will take the casual players money quicker, the casual player gets fed up of hardly winning and stops playing. So sky I see you have 2 choices 1) Enable tracking software get into a rakeback war and attract more regs, you will see a short term increase in volume (not always profit as these nits will constantly pass the blinds round pots will small and therefore rake will be.) These players will stop a couple of months and then go to the next place offering a good rb deal. 2) Dont allow rakeback or tracking software, Invest in marketing and attract casual players who play for fun, without people willing to spend there is no industry. Attracting these players by advertising the fact there is no tracking software on sky and by investing in marketing will ensure the long term prospects of the site and profits will be greater as pots are bigger. Also no need to give half of your income back to these players. From a personal point of view tracking software will see my winnings grow in the short term as my edge will be greater and I would love to see 55% rakeback that I have at a Ipoker skin as again my short term profits will grow. However, I dont want to see these changes implemented as it is not good for the long term of the poker industry. I dont know what sky's plans are for the future but I hope they seriously think about what they are wanting to achieve in the long term.
    Posted by ajs4385
    I understand what you're saying but i think your concerns are a little over the top. The very nature of SKY and the fact that they have a TV show means that nowadays, this will always be the first point of call for players getting into the game in the UK. I also don't think there will be thousands of reg's joining the site just because it allows HEM as every other site already allows it anyway.
     
    If sky does take your view and decides that not allowing HEM is the best way to be different, I think they should still get the download version, enable tables to be re-sized (for people who haven't got 3 monitors), and introduce an instant hand re-player to enable people to take notes easier.


    Salazar
Sign In or Register to comment.