You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

The WSOP 2016 Thread

189111314

Comments

  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    He got a one-round penalty last night for taunting an opponent. From what I hear, he was lucky to survive being in the tournament after receiving no less than 3 warnings in the hand.
    Posted by FCHD

    Yeh his speech play and intimidation is all part of his game, although I've personally never seen him be directly offensive, so I guess it depends on what they mean by "taunting." He may go close to the edge occasionally.

    Still would love to see him get to the FT!
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    He got a one-round penalty last night for taunting an opponent. From what I hear, he was lucky to survive being in the tournament after receiving no less than 3 warnings in the hand.
    Posted by FCHD
    These days that probably just mean he was talking.

  • edited July 2016


    He was more than "just talking", he was also "not talking"........

    This is from the WSOP Update.......


    ".....There's more than 600,000 in the pot as the river card arrives on a 5-3-2-8-10 board. William Kassouf is heads up and out of position, and he moves all in with his big stack. That puts the decision on Stacy Matuson, who has 490,000 chips left in front of her.

    While Matuson deliberates, the cameras gather around, and Kassouf starts chatting. "You don't want to be eliminated in front of the whole camera crew, do you? The whole world?" By this time, a watchful floorman has arrived, and he gives Kassouf a verbal warning about his conversation. Kassouf, however, doesn't stop. He continues to offer bits of conversation, including things like "lay it down" and "don't go broke in this hand."

    Now Matuson is getting upset, and she pleads with the floorman for some help. "How is his hand still live?" she asks.

    The floorman repeats his warning to Kassouf and explains that he and Kassouf will "have a discussion" after the hand. Kassouf continues to peck, though, and the floorman has had enough. "If you say one more word before the hand is over, I'm going to give you a penalty."

    "I'll handle this one," Tournament Director Jack Effel says, suddenly stepping into place behind Kassouf.

    Kassouf is not done trying, though. He complies with the order to remain quiet, but he mimes and gestures and waves his hands at Matuson while she thinks. He zips his lips with his fingers, then plays charades with "You show, I'll show," acting it out several times. Effel now issues him another verbal warning.

    "How about a clock?" someone at the table asks. "We want to play, too."

    Matuson is not happy with the time limit imposed on her, and she lets the clock tick all the way down to zero before open-mucking Q-Q    .

    Kassouf, on the other hand, acts pleased with himself. "Do you want to see it? Do you?" Matuson nods. "Double gutter and I missed," Kassouf says, showing 6-9   . "Nine-high like a boss! Big heart. Big heart of a lion."

    Kassouf is quickly pulled aside by Jack Effel, who issues him a one-orbit penalty for taunting.

    "How dare you call the clock on me?" Matuson says as she stands up to gather herself for a moment.

    Kassouf has a lot of chips, but they're still in an uncountable pile in front of his vacant seat -- call it 3,500,000 for now."
  • edited July 2016

    I don't have any problem with Will, or his antics, it's just his style, & away from the table he is a kind & gracious man.
     
    I DO have a problem with defying "Floor" no less than 3 times. We just can't have anarchy, & players doing as they wish.
     
    The next time this happens - especially this deep in the WSOP Main, where they all have a realistic shot at a 7 figure score, I'd throw the player out of the event, there & then.
     
    I'd bet good money neither he nor anyone else would do it again if thy knew the penalty was instant disqualification.
     
  • edited July 2016
    Hmm, I'm not sure where I stand with this one. As you correctly said TK, Will is a kind and pleasant gentleman off the table.

    We're in a heads up situation, so speech play is allowed, correct?

    Will is trying as hard as possible to get his opponent to fold and he is allowed to discuss the hand in question?

    From the transcript you provide, he has said nothing offensive, he has just tried to intimidate his opponent into folding. Whilst this may seem aggressive it should be allowed heads up as it is part of the game. There was no swearing or personal jibes.

    Matuson has called the floor trying to stop him using this tactic, which as far as I can tell, he's not broken any rules, unless they say you can't talk when heads up.

    However with the warnings received he perhaps should have toned it down more, but image is so important and if he appears to meekly conform it could negatively impact his image and negate him using a valid tactic hence forth. 

    So I am not massively against the words he's said, although I have only read a transcript, I have no information on tone, gestures etc.

    Just my thoughts.

    Cheers,

    G
  • edited July 2016
    When did it become ok to try and intimidate another player in a hand?
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    When did it become ok to try and intimidate another player in a hand?
    Posted by MrJoeBlogs

    I think it depends on peoples thoughts on intimidation and levels of.

    Lets say I'm playing live in a biggish tournament at the late stages, when a lot is at stake. If my opponent is a testosterone fueled aggressive player and I want a call.

    I may, depending on meta game, say something like, "Come on, you know your going to fold, why are you taking so long?"

    If I thought I could get his ego to kick in and make a bad call, I would deploy this tactic.

    I don't think there is anything wrong with this.

    So basically the question is what levels of intimidation are acceptable, and that's why we have tournament directors.

    I do appreciate that playing an £11 MTT at your local casino, this is possibly inappropriate, but this is the WSOP M/E!

    I like to think of myself as polite and considerate of others, but this is a game and of course, concious and subconcious intimidation is a factor.

    Just my thoughts.

    Cheers,

    G

    P.S. Also one can only be intimidated if one is intimidatable. Of course we all are intimidatable, but thresholds vary significantly. Anyone who feels intimidated at the table should work on their mental capacity to reduce any negative reaction to supposed intimidation.

    P.P.S. I have been directly at the receiving end of this type of conversation from Will Kassouf. I chose to reply and it ended being a jovial conversation and mutual respect was gained. He tried to intimidate, I didn't feel intimidated, it became a non-issue and something we joked about in the break.

    P.P.S. It was probably made worse by the fact that his opponent was female, however do you think Will Kassouf could ever intimidate Maggie Thatcher or Theresa May, I think not. In a way, the game of poker is, and should be, imo, a test of mental resilience as well as statistics, psychology etc.

  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : I think it depends on peoples thoughts on intimidation and levels of. Lets say I'm playing live in a biggish tournament at the late stages, when a lot is at stake. If my opponent is a testosterone fueled aggressive player and I want a call. I may, depending on meta game, say something like, "Come on, you know your going to fold, why are you taking so long?" If I thought I could get his ego to kick in and make a bad call, I would deploy this tactic. I don't think there is anything wrong with this. So basically the question is what levels of intimidation are acceptable, and that's why we have tournament directors. I do appreciate that playing a £11 MTT at your local casino, this is possibly inappropriate, but this is the WSOP M/E! Just my thoughts. Cheers, G
    Posted by StayOrGo
    I understand what you're saying here and if thats part of your game fair enough.

    As a recreational player I was lucky enough to win entry to the 6 max at DTD last year, this was my first time playing live.
    I really enjoyed the experience and most of the players at my table where friendly and a good time was had by all.
    If I had had to spend the day sat with this guy in my face the chances of me wanting to play live again would be pretty slim.
    Both yourself and TK are seasoned players who know the value of recs in the games yet you both seem to be condoning this sort of behaviour which surely is going to put recs off.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : I understand what you're saying here and if thats part of your game fair enough. As a recreational player I was lucky enough to win entry to the 6 max at DTD last year, this was my first time playing live. I really enjoyed the experience and most of the players at my table where friendly and a good time was had by all. If I had had to spend the day sat with this guy in my face the chances of me wanting to play live again would be pretty slim. Both yourself and TK are seasoned players who know the value of recs in the games yet you both seem to be condoning this sort of behaviour which surely is going to put recs off.
    Posted by MrJoeBlogs

    Hi Joe, I do agree with you here. I think, not blowing my own trumpet, but if you were to ask most people, they'd say I am fairly encouraging and friendly to people at the table and rarely attempt to intimidate anyone, particularly those new to the game. If I do intimidate anyone, it's usually when stakes are high and I generally only try to intimidate tough/aggresive seasoned players as it is understood by them too, that it is a facet of the game at that level.

    But absolutely agree, it's much nicer for recreational players to be welcomed and I always try to be friendly. However I think this being late stages of the WSOP M/E, all legal tactics are valid. It's no longer just a fun recreational activity at this stage.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : I understand what you're saying here and if thats part of your game fair enough. As a recreational player I was lucky enough to win entry to the 6 max at DTD last year, this was my first time playing live. I really enjoyed the experience and most of the players at my table where friendly and a good time was had by all. If I had had to spend the day sat with this guy in my face the chances of me wanting to play live again would be pretty slim. Both yourself and TK are seasoned players who know the value of recs in the games yet you both seem to be condoning this sort of behaviour which surely is going to put recs off.
    Posted by MrJoeBlogs
    Not sure I condoned his behaviour - I said I would have thrown him out of the Tournament for defying "Floor" 3 times.

    "Verbals" are part of the live game, whether we like it or not. I don't like them, not one bit, & would never lower myself to do that sort of stuff, but speech play is within the rules. Defying "floor" is not.
     
    Quite a difference between a £1,000 event with a hundred thou up top, & the late stages of the WSOP Main, with $8 milly up top, in an event which at this stage is populated almost entirely by hard nosed pros.  
     
  • edited July 2016

    there is something that must be included here.

    we can judge whether will's chat is ok or not.  however, the TD judged that it was not ok.  the important element is the TD told will to cease.

    that is all ok and straightforward.

    however, will continued and did not respect the order and circumvented the instruction by signing.  we are now in a different place.

    alike (although differing in scale) a judge may place a restraining order.  if a villain wishes to break that order it is no longer an issue of the harm the act causes (which is now pretty irrelevant) it is now an issue of not obeying the court.  this is a different league.

    i like will, i think his actions are fine.  mainly amusing.

    if the TD said desist he should have complied.  he was lucky that the punishment for disobeying was not disqualification.

    having said all this, i think he should do exactly the same next time.  but if told to stop, then stop.  he is in a very different place.

    good hunting will.




  • edited July 2016
    From reading i think she done well not snapping. Some people may have punched him in the face

    Then she would have been the one in trouble
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    there is something that must be included here. we can judge whether will's chat is ok or not.  however, the TD judged that it was not ok.  the important element is the TD told will to cease. that is all ok and straightforward. however, will continued and did not respect the order and circumvented the instruction by signing.  we are now in a different place. alike (although differing in scale) a judge may place a restraining order.  if a villain wishes to break that order it is no longer an issue of the harm the act causes (which is now pretty irrelevant) it is now an issue of not obeying the court.  this is a different league. i like will, i think his actions are fine.  mainly amusing. if the TD said desist he should have complied.  he was lucky that the punishment for disobeying was not disqualification. having said all this, i think he should do exactly the same next time.  but if told to stop, then stop.  he is in a very different place. good hunting will.
    Posted by aussie09

    Agree, he was warned, defied, warned about possible penalty being imposed.

    He then got, what was probably a fair, one orbit penalty.

    Appropriate level of justice served imo
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : Not sure I condoned his behaviour - I said I would have thrown him out of the Tournament for defying "Floor" 3 times. "Verbals" are part of the live game, whether we like it or not. I don't like them, not one bit, & would never lower myself to do that sort of stuff, but speech play is within the rules. Defying "floor" is not.   Quite a difference between a £1,000 event with a hundred thou up top, & the late stages of the WSOP Main, with $8 milly up top, in an event which at this stage is populated almost entirely by hard nosed pros.    
    Posted by Tikay10
    You did also say. "I don't have any problem with Will, or his antics, it's just his style, & away from the table he is a kind & gracious man.

    I dont really think it's right that you can say it's ok in 1 event and not another.
  • edited July 2016
    Don't think he's done much wrong as such, but when the TD gets involved then he should probably just zip it. I imagine he thought he was close to getting her to fold when the TD intervened, and thus pushed his luck to get a fold.

    Game needs characters, and he's that if nothing else.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : Hi Joe, I do agree with you here. I think, not blowing my own trumpet, but if you were to ask most people, they'd say I am fairly encouraging and friendly to people at the table and rarely attempt to intimidate anyone, particularly those new to the game. If I do intimidate anyone, it's usually when stakes are high and I generally only try to intimidate tough/aggresive seasoned players as it is understood by them too, that it is a facet of the game at that level. But absolutely agree, it's much nicer for recreational players to be welcomed and I always try to be friendly. However I think this being late stages of the WSOP M/E, all legal tactics are valid. It's no longer just a fun recreational activity at this stage.
    Posted by StayOrGo
    I know you do a lot of good work on here Graham and the charity league you run is admirable. I have also seen you offer lots of free and very good advice including your HH thread which to recs like myself is absolute gold.
    It was for this reason I found it a little surprising you thought this guys tactics was ok.

    For me personally all this guys antics wouldn't intimidate me but it would wind me up and make me pretty angry which could possibly carry on off the table.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : I know you do a lot of good work on here Graham and the charity league you run is admirable. I have also seen you offer lots of free and very good advice including your HH thread which to recs like myself is absolute gold. It was for this reason I found it a little surprising you thought this guys tactics was ok. For me personally all this guys antics wouldn't intimidate me but it would wind me up and make me pretty angry which could possibly carry on off the table.
    Posted by MrJoeBlogs

    Sounds like you have the problem then, not him.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : Sounds like you have the problem then, not him.
    Posted by hhyftrftdr
    Absolutely nothing to add to a reasonable discussion, you just have to get your personal little digs in dont you.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : Absolutely nothing to add to a reasonable discussion, you just have to get your personal little digs in dont you.
    Posted by MrJoeBlogs

    ?

    I posted above my thoughts, then you said you might get angry in that situation and said anger might be taken off the table too. This suggests that you have the problem if you can't control your emotions, and I'd have said this regardless of who the poster was.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : I know you do a lot of good work on here Graham and the charity league you run is admirable. I have also seen you offer lots of free and very good advice including your HH thread which to recs like myself is absolute gold. It was for this reason I found it a little surprising you thought this guys tactics was ok. For me personally all this guys antics wouldn't intimidate me but it would wind me up and make me pretty angry which could possibly carry on off the table.
    Posted by MrJoeBlogs

    Thanks for the kind comments Joe.

    I do like to think of myself as a friendly, approachable person and I get much satisfaction helping other people, and seeing them doing well.

    Although on the poker table in big live tournaments, I don't mind it, if people think I'm intimidating, if it helps my image.

    I guess I separate the personality traits required in poker to those required when away from the table.

    If people were to think I'm a tough competitor at the table and a gentle considerate person off it, then that would be ideal for me.

    I just separate the poker player persona from the actual person. One thing I do not like though is people intimidating recreational players or new players, which is why I behave very different in small games than perhaps I do in bigger ones against seasoned pros.

    Cheers,

    G

  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : ? I posted above my thoughts, then you said you might get angry in that situation and said anger might be taken off the table too. This suggests that you have the problem if you can't control your emotions, and I'd have said this regardless of who the poster was.
    Posted by hhyftrftdr
    You made a personal comment about me which has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion.

    Being angry doeasn't mean you cant control your emotions, It is an emotion just like being happy or sad is.
  • edited July 2016
    IMO its like diving in football, the rewards are so great and the punishment so lax you can understand why they do it, i guess he just felt he was maxing out his verbal edge, its the rule-makers fault if anything, give him a chip deduction or disqualification and i doubt he would do it again, but a 1 orbit penalty for getting someone to make a crucial fold was well worth it im sure. 
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : You made a personal comment about me which has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion. Being angry doeasn't mean you cant control your emotions, It is an emotion just like being happy or sad is.
    Posted by MrJoeBlogs

    Right.

    ------------------------------------

    With you Jordan, something I alluded to that getting a fold and a minor punishment was much better than following the TD's directions but her potentially calling.
  • edited July 2016
    After watching plenty of poker on you tube, when a player postures and gestures , they mostly havent got it.

  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    After watching plenty of poker on you tube, when a player postures and gestures , they mostly havent got it.
    Posted by chilling

    Yes quite often players give more away than they gain. Will is quite good at getting the result he wants, but I've also seen pro's let him hang his self through his own speech.


  • edited July 2016
    Getting back to the matter at hand:

    They are playing down to 27 players today, and there's been a flurry of early eliminations, The first hour or so has seen 13 bustouts, including one Brit, Jason McConnon from Manchester when he shoved with top pair top kicker but unfortunately his opponent had flopped a set and that was bye bye Jason. He finished 78th for just over $80K.

    67 left and counting.

    David Lhonore (without an apostrophe today) and Will Kassouf have lost a few, Andrew Christoforou picked up a few and both Elliot Peterman and Max Silver have gained over a million chips so far today.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    David Lhonore (without an apostrophe today) and Will Kassouf have lost a few, A so far today.
    Posted by FCHD

    I'm heartbroken.........



  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : I'm heartbroken.........
    Posted by Glenelg
    Quite clearly two camps here!
  • edited July 2016
    67. Wesley Brockhoeft (USA)
    66. Maxim Sorokin (RUS)
    65. Nicolas Fisher (GER)
    64. Matthias Habernig (AUT)
    All pick up $96787

    That's a ladder point so the next player out will be the first to earn a 6-figure payday.

    Tom Middleton has increased his stack by 50% recently and moved himself back in to the top half of the field.

    Valentin Vornicu has regained the chip lead, but Jerry Wong and Kenny Hallaert are close behind.

    No Brits in the immediate danger zone, but it's NLH so one clash of good hands and anything could happen.
  • edited July 2016
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread:
    In Response to Re: The WSOP 2016 Thread : Quite clearly two camps here!
    Posted by chilling

    I'm in the NEWARK camp.

Sign In or Register to comment.