imagine having nothing better to do and making a big deal out of nothinggg......................... .................................. .................................... ................................... Posted by PokerKinga
Guys, See my previous reply. Am not in a position to get any answers from the office tonight, as you know, but will send the thread up for them to see. Will close the thread for now before the software implodes form an overload of multiple exclamation and question marks. It will be re-opened in the morning. Posted by Tikay10
Not because people have got nothing better to do than complain about trivial things,
I asked for it changed because I hate it, people asked if it was this screen name and I was honest. Sad that certain players/ people have to look at things so cynically and accuse me of doing it to gain an 'edge'. I find it quite sad really that people can be so bitter and have nothing better to do than be spiteful towards others for the sake of it
Neither The Business or I are suggesting you did it for ulterior means, though I can't speak for what other players may think. They can't really be blamed for being suspicious of the reasons.
It is not, however, a "trivial thing", as other, less scrupulous sorts, would certainly try to do it for all the wrong reasons.
I don't blame the other players for complaining either, though it could have been handled quickly, quietly, no drama or fuss if someone had sent me a PM or contacted CC.
Anyway, it's sorted now, let's move on.
PS - Think you & I met in Punta Cana in 2015? Extremely good-looking fella, right?
Not because people have got nothing better to do than complain about trivial things, I asked for it changed because I hate it, people asked if it was this screen name and I was honest. Sad that certain players/ people have to look at things so cynically and accuse me of doing it to gain an 'edge'. I find it quite sad really that people can be so bitter and have nothing better to do than be spiteful towards others for the sake of it Posted by PokerKinga
No because when asked if you was pokerkinga you denied it. You knew it was giving you an edge even if it was just for a week or two.
I asked quite a few people and they all wasn't sure if you was a new player or not.
Why should you be the only one who gets to change their alias? I know quite a few people who would like to change theirs but can't because it would be crazy to let everyone change their alias you wouldn't know who was who after months/years of building reads on your opponents.
Slagg me off all you want calling me a "sad loser" .. etc not really that bothered.
In Response to Re: Screen Names : No because when asked if you was pokerkinga you denied it. You knew it was giving you an edge even if it was just for a week or two. I asked quite a few people and they all wasn't sure if you was a new player or not. Why should you be the only one who gets to change their alias? I know quite a few people who would like to change theirs but can't because it would be crazy to let everyone change their alias you wouldn't know who was who after months/years of building reads on your opponents. Slagg me off all you want calling me a "sad loser" .. etc not really that bothered. Posted by BigHawk89
I can't really comment on any of that except the emboldened part.
For clarity, screen-names/aliases CANNOT BE CHANGED.
Neither The Business or I are suggesting you did it for ulterior means, though I can't speak for what other players may think. They can't really be blamed for being suspicious of the reasons. It is not, however, a "trivial thing", as other, less scrupulous sorts, would certainly try to do it for all the wrong reasons. I don't blame the other players for complaining either, though it could have been handled quickly, quietly, no drama or fuss if someone had sent me a PM or contacted CC. Anyway, it's sorted now, let's move on. PS - Think you & I met in Punta Cana in 2015? Extremely good-looking fella, right? Posted by Tikay10
Sorry maybe I could have worded better, post wasn't directed at you personally or sky, whole situation has just irritated me, it wouldn't have bothered me if another players screen name had changed
even if someone was playing under a different name, it's not to hard to work out their general playing style once you played a few hands , and I'm sure notes would have carried across
Yes we met in punta Cana enjoyed it was great experience, not sure about good looking part ha
In Response to Re: Screen Names : Sorry maybe I could have worded better, post wasn't directed at you personally or sky, whole situation has just irritated me, it wouldn't have bothered me if another players screen name had changed even if someone was playing under a different name, it's not to hard to work out their general playing style once you played a few hands , and I'm sure notes would have carried across Yes we met in punta Cana enjoyed it was great experience, not sure about good looking part ha Posted by PokerKinga
No worries, I was addressing it generally.
You are a most unusual poker player if changed aliases don't bother you - it's a fundamental & would upset most that I know of.
Good looking? I was talking about me, not you......;)
In Response to Re: Screen Names : No because when asked if you was pokerkinga you denied it. You knew it was giving you an edge even if it was just for a week or two. I asked quite a few people and they all wasn't sure if you was a new player or not. Why should you be the only one who gets to change their alias? I know quite a few people who would like to change theirs but can't because it would be crazy to let everyone change their alias you wouldn't know who was who after months/years of building reads on your opponents. Slagg me off all you want calling me a "sad loser" .. etc not really that bothered. Posted by BigHawk89
In Response to Re: Screen Names : Reads and notes aren't the be -all and end-all. Posted by chilling
They are a huuuuuge factor when it's 2 cash regs playing against each other who have played 100,000+ hands together. No one thing in poker is the be-all and end-all but something like knowing who you're playing against is pretty close
It's absolutely unreal to call this a trivial matter. It's a huge thing when you have notes on every single reg that you are playing thousands of hands with day in day out and all those players think you're an unknown/new player. Sure the benefits of it won't last forever, but it's 100% a big advantage to the name changer and a massive disadvantage to the person who doesn't know about it.
As Tikay said, it's sorted now, although that being said, would it have ever been sorted if not for a Sky player reporting it? I have no idea how this could have happened even in error, I assume the people at CC who aren't always on the ball RE stuff like this wouldn't even have the power to make a change like that so presumably it must have been done by someone who should know better? If this thread hadn't happened would they just be playing on as Craigggg?
I have heard a few people stating that they hate their alias. normally they just set it when making the account for a bit of a laugh say, and after playing for a while become embarrassed about it. Unfortunately changing an alias can give you a temporary advantage over other players who now think you are a different person. To help get around this how about allowing people one change of alias when signing on, and when used it only gets reset after 5 years. Also the new alias would have the old alias in brackets after the new one for say 3 months. Just an idea, any thoughts anyone, could it even be done, would we want to?
In Response to Re: Screen Names : They are a huuuuuge factor when it's 2 cash regs playing against each other who have played 100,000+ hands together. No one thing in poker is the be-all and end-all but something like knowing who you're playing against is pretty close It's absolutely unreal to call this a trivial matter. It's a huge thing when you have notes on every single reg that you are playing thousands of hands with day in day out and all those players think you're an unknown/new player. Sure the benefits of it won't last forever, but it's 100% a big advantage to the name changer and a massive disadvantage to the person who doesn't know about it. As Tikay said, it's sorted now, although that being said, would it have ever been sorted if not for a Sky player reporting it? I have no idea how this could have happened even in error, I assume the people at CC who aren't always on the ball RE stuff like this wouldn't even have the power to make a change like that so presumably it must have been done by someone who should know better? If this thread hadn't happened would they just be playing on as Craigggg? Posted by Lambert180
I wasn't referring to the name change. Notes and reads on a player that an individual plays 100,000s of hands with seems pointless.Both players having notes and reads on each other obviously, where's the advantage? Cant be that great, otherwise one would avoid the other.
In Response to Re: Screen Names : I wasn't referring to the name change. Notes and reads on a player that an individual plays 100,000s of hands with seems pointless.Both players having notes and reads on each other obviously, where's the advantage? Cant be that great, otherwise one would avoid the other. Posted by chilling
I wish that just occasionally I could understand your posts
In Response to Re: Screen Names : I wasn't referring to the name change. Notes and reads on a player that an individual plays 100,000s of hands with seems pointless.Both players having notes and reads on each other obviously, where's the advantage? Cant be that great, otherwise one would avoid the other. Posted by chilling
How are they pointless? They are often gonna determine how he play a massive amount of situations
Not all players are equal are they? Imagine player A isn't a great reg, he has some big leaks and we have notes on what those leaks are and so obviously play differently against them to exploit those leaks. Then they turn up with a totally different name (which you don't know about obviously) so you play differently against them. Playing differently might mean we bluff catch against someone where if we knew who they were we'd know they never bluff, or we might try bluffing them when if we knew who they were we'd know they're a massive station and we shouldn't bluff them. We may get hands in pre against them that we wouldn't normally against player A cos we know player A only gets in KK+ pre but we don't know that now.
Sometimes you're right that neither player has a big advantage once they both have good notes on each other BUT once you change the name that's not the case anymore is it, one person has full notes on their opponent and one person is totally readless, which leads to the name changer having a big advantage.
I can't stress how huge a difference it makes. It's huge.
I thought the art of poker was mixing it up? I view poker like a handicap race, different day, different winner. If you went to a casino, would you not take a seat unless you knew every player at the table? Posted by chilling
Ofc I would sit in a casino, and I'd be knowingly readless, as would my opponent. It'd be realllllly odd to sit in a live casino with a bloke who has played against me for 100s of hours and yet I don't know him at all... how would that work exactly?
This is the 2nd thread where I've genuinely not known if you are just leveling/trolling or not. I don't wanna bang on about it too much RE Kinga cos thankfully it's been sorted now (although I do still wonder if it would have been sorted without this thread) but I just think it's laughable for it to be called trivial and so I wanted to make sure less knowledgeable people are aware of how massive a difference it makes.
Why do you think HUDs are so popular amongst regs, and people who don't have them or don't know how to use them well feel at a disadvantage (when playing v people who have them)? Notes over hundreds of thousands of hands are usesless anyway, why bother.
For a start, i play for fun or a hobby,whatever.If two cash players had huds, and were both preficient at using them against each other, wheres the advantage? You can label my view in whatever category you like.I dont play for cash directly, so maybe shouldnt comment, but certain things said on the forum, from mine as a recreational viewpoint, sound a touch like insecurity.
Comments
If you have any concerns in this area, please let CC know.
Good morning.
Some sort of misunderstanding arose here & an alias was changed in error.
It should not have happened, apologies.
The account has now reverted to it's original alias.
For the avoidance of doubt, screen-names/aliases CANNOT BE CHANGED ordinarily. As we all know, of course.
Neither The Business or I are suggesting you did it for ulterior means, though I can't speak for what other players may think. They can't really be blamed for being suspicious of the reasons.
It is not, however, a "trivial thing", as other, less scrupulous sorts, would certainly try to do it for all the wrong reasons.
I don't blame the other players for complaining either, though it could have been handled quickly, quietly, no drama or fuss if someone had sent me a PM or contacted CC.
Anyway, it's sorted now, let's move on.
PS - Think you & I met in Punta Cana in 2015? Extremely good-looking fella, right?
For clarity, screen-names/aliases CANNOT BE CHANGED.
This should not have been allowed to happen, but it was, in error.
It's been sorted now, & I don't think we need to have a ruck about it at this stage.
Apologies for the error.
You are a most unusual poker player if changed aliases don't bother you - it's a fundamental & would upset most that I know of.
Good looking? I was talking about me, not you......;)
Unfortunately changing an alias can give you a temporary advantage over other players who now think you are a different person. To help get around this how about allowing people one change of alias when signing on, and when used it only gets reset after 5 years. Also the new alias would have the old alias in brackets after the new one for say 3 months. Just an idea, any thoughts anyone, could it even be done, would we want to?