You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Sky, can you review the league system you have.
It`s both boring, and unfair.
It seems, the more money you play with, the more points you get.
A complete revamp is needed to generate more interest, and to make it fair for everyone.
Mike.
Comments
Should be more fairer, why should them that pay £100s rake get more than those that pay £1!
But I also agree that for those of us on the first rungs of the ladder the league and our meagre points haul are completely meaningless.
Maybe at the end of the month they could be converted/boiled down into poker points or something.
A league system should be formed from a level playing field. !!!!!!
Those that play for £100`s aint gonna be bothered about the league...............
Come on Sky, sort out a proper, fair league system to suit every single player on your site, regardless of bankroll.
I`m sure those who spend billions of dollars can still be rewarded in other ways....:)
and the league doesnt mirror this.
I think the league does need looking at to become fairer to all Sky players......
just a brain storm on this one..
As with the team games players interested in the league should opt in at a given level at the end of the month for the next months games...
Level 1.....2p-10p
Level 2.....10p-50p
Level 3.....50p-2.00p
.....etc. etc.
and points are awarded at their chosen level, end of the month award a League freeroll for top players at each level who play each other for Grand Monthly Sky Poker League Champion.
I know the idea needs fine tuned but there is a great op for braggin rights if the 2p players can take out the high rollers at the end of the month....make good TV also give new players a level to aim for.
Just an idea ...
Thoughts.
Colin
MY IDEA.
1- Keep the current league format you have, but rename it "Rewards League".
2- Start a completely new league format. With one multi player tournament each week, which anyone can enter.
3- Top 50 players each win points, from 50 points for winning, down to one point for finishing 50th.
4- This a fair way of having a league.
5- The league can be run over a number of weeks, and i`m sure would generate a lot more interest than the current system.
eg
1 point for any cash hand won and for STTs & MTTs use the minimum award structure with double points for the main events!
It would be easy to implement and would reflect a person's ability rather than how much they can afford!
I'm sure that the vast majority of higher stakes players wouldn't have too much of a problem with this and it would give the smaller BRs a much better chance of achieving something, thus, encouraging them to play more!
Just my thoughts!
Another good idea Diggerman the only problem is Sky dont give a toss. It took me ages to read all the responses from them about this. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
ive said for ages now that the stt league is unfair with the russian roullette games getting points and nothing happened about it however last year i was playing alot of turbo heads up as there was lots of points on it ...........1 big name complaned about it and that was that the points was gone from the game bit of a joke really but i guess thats the way it goes
I think that's a little unfair, if I may say so - though perhaps I would say that - but you are jumping to conclusions which are incorrect.
The Suits do NOT monitor the Forums as such, but they do respond if the issue is raised directly with Customer Care, or with them directly. Had I seen the Thread, I would certainly have done so, & bought it to their attention. I'm afraid that due to time-constraints, I rarely see anything which is not on "General Poker Chat" board.
I will send it to them today.
It is right & proper, in my personal view, that those who spend most get the biggest rewards - it is a business, after all, & the bigger Clients need looking after, as they would in ANY business, but not at the expense of the regular guys. Findng the "right balance" which pleases everyone is never easy. But I agree, a League which is fair to ALL players at ALL Levels would be attractive to many.
We could all cut to the quick more effectively if these sort of things were not said.