You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Comments
See, there's a thing. I dont make assumptions about other players.
Was great had a number of the sky poker players railing, felt really nice.
Alan you have msn? lol.
Oh yeah stop moaning guys. All poker is rigged obv so why moan.
Was a great confidence booster and in fairness i did get lucky on two occassions but in an 8 hr long tournament can you really win it without a little bit of luck?
Although the AK v AA turnaround was pretty huge, and extremely lucky, never before have i actually said, i should have avoided that. 50BB deep i really shouldnt have been happy to flip.
But none the less as you said something i can build a roll from, my financial management is worse than my BRM, mainly because i looked at money for far too long without seeing the importance of it.
Morale of the story, im always wrong lol.
Seems our fortunes have changed!
You are winning and i have been losing!
PS. the moaning is getting tedious.
Like sky dave says if you think online poker is dodgy just don't play..................
anyways, best stop talking about this on here, i might get a row.
You say that people look at this topic in such a narrow minded way, That claim is just as spurious as your innuendo of skypoker being possably rigged, Why is it narrow minded to dissagree with what you say? You have put your points on public display in such small detail over a long period of time. Are you saying we dont have enough decernment to understand what you say? or is it just another assumption?.
You cant just say your point is valid, You have to prove its valid,
No1 your point is in no way as relative as mine as my point includes no assumptions
No2 Unless Advertising executives have got it wrong over the decades what you say on public forums has an effect.
No3 The effect of your points, although I believe are given in good faith might lead begginers in the poker world to the wrong conclusion and lead to thier early exit from the game.
No4 Your points about rngs are usually on threads related to bad beats leading the reader to question skypokers integrity.
No5 You are claiming that my reply to you was rude probably because I said in my opinion your points were spurious repetative and annoying, The only claim you have here is that im pointing out the uncomfortable truth.
For the record I do my fair share of skypoker bashing so im not one sided, I do have some gripes but try to put them forward in a fair manner. On the whole the service is not perfect but its better than any other I have had dealings with.
Peter
Re: fix
First: 11/3/2011
Last: 11/3/2011
Posted by duacelXL
You are an idiot. Just annoyed cause your no good.
I hold to my opinion that the majority of threads where the rng discussion has been brought up has usually started of with a bad beat story with accussations of skypoker being fixed, This implies that the two are connected and could be argued as slander. 1+1= 2, Any one reading those threads know whats being implied and to deny it is downright cowardice.
If someone wants to make a point they should make it outright like the way irishrover made his point regarding the rake in micro, He didnt pu ssy foot about trying imply saying 1+1=2 he just said it.
The point you and ambyr make is more cloak an dagger, I would not have even commented on this subject if I didnt believe that you two are putting a valid disscussion in an inappropriate format and putting doubt into the players who are starting out.
All the players on skypoker are on a level playing field and anyone who developes thier game enough can make a lot of money from poker(Thats a fact), What isnt a fact is that the imperfections of the rng will stop people developing a winning game.
And yes, you are very rude.
The OT told people to stop moaning about bad beats and online poker being rigged. By its nature my post is very relative. Where I have discussed this "repetitive" subject it has always been linked to the context of the thread. I see where you're coming from though, I find the standard propaganda in support of online poker very shallow and repetitive.
Overall though you have a point, a point only needs to be made so many times.
Stating a slanderous opinion is slanderous.
Implying on badbeat/skypoker is fixed threads that the reason people are somehow not on a level playing field because of rng is Imo slander.
Note I have the courtesy to reply to what you say, I dont just throw in irelevent obvious remarks like your answer to my recent post.
I Am clearly stating your opinion on rng is valid but only in a cerain context.
The wrong context IMO would be on skypoker is fixed/bad beat threads.
Linking the two might pull the heart out of the players dreaming of improving thier game to make money and make them give up for the wrong reasons.
Please respond to what im actually saying not what Im not saying.
I have never said you dont compromise.. There iv dealt with that feeble attempt to put words in my mouth.
Your mind is not made up on the matter, Maybe I can help you along there by pointing out your rng points contextually wrong.
Me pointing out what is not an assumption and is indeed fact is not rude,At most it can only be described as hurtful, The facts im talking about are repetition bumping on about one subject(fact) boring to some people(fact) Liable to lead some beginners to think the game is fixed(fact)
If you pee in the streets an someone points it out in public some might say its rude to do that but hey if no one points it out they might think its ok.
Ok I cant speak for everyone but when I speak, I speak for myself And have no agenda other than informing beginners in poker that its a level playing field Imo And rng will not affect ones ability to develop a winning game, No propaganda with me mate just straight talk. If you mean you think my contribution on this topic is propaganda please have the ba llsi to say it and not go down the road of innuendo.
Note I responded to what you said , Please do me the same courtesy.
I will PM you rather than childishly try and score points in the forum. But I will state here that I was not implying that your contribution was propaganda, I was giving a very simple like for like comparison on what two individuals with alternate perspectives may find repetitive.
Also it has nothing to do with balls bud. Selectively misinterpreting what someone is saying and being overly critical and hostile isnt brave, its pretty much the opposite.
Ok substitute one word liable for slander and bobs your uncle.
Your honer I stabbed him to death , you said I shot him, lol you lose your honer I must be innocent.
Why does it make you laugh that I might make such a minor mistake??
People make spelling/grama/mistakes all the time, It doesnt detract to much from what they are saying.
A man catches a thief stealing his wallet, he makes a statment to the police saying he stole my walet, The.... ple boid thief says officer I must be innocent he spelled wallet wrong. Way to go einstein.
And yes in my opinion it does have to do with ba lls, porporting that the people who dissagree with your rng points are engaging in propaganda while its obvious that we are discussing my dissagreement of your points is in fact implying that my opinion is propaganda.
Your Answers to all the posts thus far have been vague and havnt addressed the points im putting forward.
I Am dealing with this on the forum because you brought it up on the forum.
You have said on this thread exactly the sum total of what is in your head.
nothing
I pretty much already agreed with you and said a point only needs making so many times. I'm not implying your trying to score points, I'm flat out stating thats what your doing. I suggest you go back, look at my post, then yours and ask yourself if your looking for a conversation or simply an argument.
As i said I will PM you concerning the rest
2) Elvis may be alive and living on the moon.
3)Tikay may play a hand worse than AA.
4)Maxally may play a rebuy.
5) Sky poker may be rigged.
6) We all may get a £10k tax rebate this year.
All of these statements may or may not be true, but to hear the same arguments put forward by the same people across many different threads on this forum would get boring whichever statement they supported.
But if anyone has any evidence relating to any of the above I would be glad to hear it.