You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

setups,action hands,just how often is often?

2456

Comments

  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    so what your saying is the rng is str coz its liscienced and the algorithm is bent coz it aint?
    Posted by pod1

    An rng, does what it says,your right it will never be truely random but is good enough for me,the second level of programming takes the pack,and distributes the cards accordingly....

    that is where the Algorithm s live and apparently is for our benefit as customers...


  • edited May 2011
    i understand that bit, but if the same people who do the rng are the same people who write the algorythm,where does the site come into it to make it less unfair!!
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    i understand that bit, but if the same people who do the rng are the same people who write the algorythm,where does the site come into it to make it less unfair!!
    Posted by pod1

    Your right its all in the programming,i would think most sites either license or rent the program and take their commission....
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    i understand that bit, but if the same people who do the rng are the same people who write the algorythm,where does the site come into it to make it less unfair!!
    Posted by pod1

    The company that certify the RNG (to say it is generating sequences as it should) also design and supply the software used. They advertise this and also that they design and supply the software for the casino games - you know the ones that have a fixed (and changeable) win to lose ratio built into them. 

    One of the things I found when I started looking at this subject was a string of complaints from an online casino operator who uses the same software. Their complaints were that some online casinos were changing the win/lose ratio in order to increase their profits. The complaint was aimed at the accreditation organisation who they alledge are issuing certificates of conformity to these sites without ever undertaking checks to ensure that they are conforming.

    The name of that company is TST - I assume you know who they are?



  • edited May 2011
    I have copid below some sections of the letter -

    ''This email is a collective question from a number of online gaming affiliates who are beginning to question the authenticity of online casinos boasting TST accreditations, not to mention the due diligence of TST itself.For example, there is a growing, large percentage of online casinos that have the TST logo on their homepages, and yet do not link to a certificate.Whose to say these sites are actually TST certified?Additionally, there are several Top Game casinos linking to so-called documents, which in effect are nothing self-written press releases.These documents may look legit to a newbie online gambler, but this is essentially a press release anyone could create with a text editor.And then, there are sites linking to valid TST certificates for Real Time Gaming Software, which albeit is valid for RTG, yet is not necessarily for the online casino.'' ''Quite frankly, we believe this shines a negative light on TST, and until something is done about this, we will be getting the message out there across blogs and forums.Your response addressing this matter is appreciated and will be considered in regards to updates on the matter. If TST bills itself to be an “internationally recognized” testing facility, and “one of the world’s most experienced gaming test labs”, don’t you think the players – who essentially keep you in business – deserve more transparency?''I can PM the link to this to anyone who would like it. In that you will see that this operator tried to glean information from TST and met the same stonewalling that I did. And this isn't a punter - this is an Online Casino Operator! 
  • edited May 2011


    Also any site that is able to change its source code...(update)....should therefore be certified everytime it was updated.....yes?
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    Also any site that is able to change its source code...(update)....should therefore be certified everytime it was updated.....yes?
    Posted by djblacke04
    Yes, but if you check out some certificates you will see that some are 2 years old.
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often? : Yes, but if you check out some certificates you will see that some are 2 years old.
    Posted by elsadog
    Are these certifications enshrined in law, that operators must have them to operate, and if they are, who regulates the bodies issuing the certificates, and if they are not obligatory, why bother, or you could just 'set up' your own version of the 'Alderney gaming commission' using a 'totally independent subsidiary :)' of your firm and print your own certificate!
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often? : Are these certifications enshrined in law, that operators must have them to operate, and if they are, who regulates the bodies issuing the certificates, and if they are not obligatory, why bother, or you could just 'set up' your own version of the 'Alderney gaming commission' using a 'totally independent subsidiary :)' of your firm and print your own certificate!
    Posted by loonytoons

    yeah , only thing is you have to be in a place which has 0% business tax...


    welcome to the republic of DJ land...anyone want a license,me and a couple of mates have started a commission , give us 100 grand and we will let you have a server....we will just start a company called 'tottally shot testers'.....(please no replys about the typo) and print out a bit of paper,or create a wordpad document and stick it on our site...

    any complaints we will send out the standard ,'we have analysed your results,and in fact if you play 2 million games you will find it all in order,so please fork off until you have done so.'
  • edited May 2011
    I'm not sure if I'm being very dense here, but .............

    Is the simplistic basis of the argument that the RNG shuffles the pack as well as could reasonably be expected, but the algorithm means the pack isn't dealt in the order it's been shuffled to?
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    I'm not sure if I'm being very dense here, but ............. Is the simplistic basis of the argument that the RNG shuffles the pack as well as could reasonably be expected, but the algorithm means the pack isn't dealt in the order it's been shuffled to?
    Posted by harding10
    The RNG does NOT, i repeat NOT shuffle the PACK
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    I'm not sure if I'm being very dense here, but ............. Is the simplistic basis of the argument that the RNG shuffles the pack as well as could reasonably be expected, but the algorithm means the pack isn't dealt in the order it's been shuffled to?
    Posted by harding10

    The pRNG produces randomised sequences of cards. The first question is how these are delivered to the table. The second question is whether all generated sequences are used.

    For instance: 

    The outcome or outcomes (all anticipated players may not participate in the hand) are known in advance. That means that the winning hand is known before delivery. Card sequences could be delivered in any order to the players without altering the RNG output and thereby satisfying all tests for conformity. Because all sequences are known and are able to be generated much quicker than they are used these sequences could be stored and used as required. A sample batch of sequences would satisfy the checks for randomness because they have not been changed. The only change is in the timing of their use. As far as can be determined no checks are undertaken to ensure they are used in strict rotation or indeed that all are used. 

    The outputted sequences could easily be categorised and utilised as and when it is deemed necessary.

  • edited May 2011

    Usual night on sky.......My question why is this the norm.

    snorky Small blind  150.00 150.00 1850.00
    JONNYGAVFC Big blind  300.00 450.00 9800.00
      Your hole cards
    • 6
    • 6
         
    DIDGERIDOO Fold     
    dano001 Call  300.00 750.00 1235.00
    willie Fold     
    snorky Call  150.00 900.00 1700.00
    JONNYGAVFC Check     
    Flop
       
    • 2
    • 2
    • 4
         
    snorky Bet  900.00 1800.00 800.00
    JONNYGAVFC Fold     
    dano001 All-in  1235.00 3035.00 0.00
    snorky Call  335.00 3370.00 465.00
    snorky Show
    • 6
    • 6
       
    dano001 Show
    • 4
    • Q
       
    Turn
       
    • 4
         
    River
       
    • J
         
    dano001 Win Full House, 4s and 2s 3370.00  3370.00
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    Usual night on sky.......My question why is this the norm. snorky Small blind   150.00 150.00 1850.00 JONNYGAVFC Big blind   300.00 450.00 9800.00   Your hole cards 6 6       DIDGERIDOO Fold         dano001 Call   300.00 750.00 1235.00 willie Fold         snorky Call   150.00 900.00 1700.00 JONNYGAVFC Check         Flop     2 2 4       snorky Bet   900.00 1800.00 800.00 JONNYGAVFC Fold         dano001 All-in   1235.00 3035.00 0.00 snorky Call   335.00 3370.00 465.00 snorky Show 6 6       dano001 Show 4 Q       Turn     4       River     J       dano001 Win Full House, 4s and 2s 3370.00   3370.00
    Posted by snorky
    another
    snorky Small blind  600.00 600.00 1250.00
    scottystar Big blind  1200.00 1800.00 3892.50
      Your hole cards
    • Q
    • 10
         
    spartan7 Fold     
    4dogs Fold     
    jen100 Fold     
    snorky All-in  1250.00 3050.00 0.00
    scottystar Call  650.00 3700.00 3242.50
    snorky Show
    • Q
    • 10
       
    scottystar Show
    • 7
    • 4
       
    Flop
       
    • 6
    • 10
    • 5
         
    Turn
       
    • A
         
    River
       
    • 8
         
    scottystar Win Straight to the 8 3700.00  
  • edited May 2011

    another

    snorky Small blind 300.00 300.00 3165.00
    eamonn1959 Big blind  600.00 900.00 2830.00
      Your hole cards
    • K
    • K
         
    scottystar Fold     
    spartan7 Fold     
    4dogs Fold     
    snorky Raise  900.00 1800.00 2265.00
    eamonn1959 All-in  2830.00 4630.00 0.00
    snorky All-in  2265.00 6895.00 0.00
    snorky Unmatched bet  35.00 6860.00 35.00
    snorky Show
    • K
    • K
       
    eamonn1959 Show
    • A
    • 6
       
    Flop
       
    • 8
    • J
    • 9
         
    Turn
       
    • 4
         
    River
       
    • A
         
    eamonn1959 Win Pair of Aces 6860.00
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    Usual night on sky.......My question why is this the norm. snorky Small blind   150.00 150.00 1850.00 JONNYGAVFC Big blind   300.00 450.00 9800.00   Your hole cards 6 6       DIDGERIDOO Fold         dano001 Call   300.00 750.00 1235.00 willie Fold         snorky Call   150.00 900.00 1700.00 JONNYGAVFC Check         Flop     2 2 4       snorky Bet   900.00 1800.00 800.00 JONNYGAVFC Fold         dano001 All-in   1235.00 3035.00 0.00 snorky Call   335.00 3370.00 465.00 snorky Show 6 6       dano001 Show 4 Q       Turn     4       River     J       dano001 Win Full House, 4s and 2s 3370.00   3370.00
    Posted by snorky

    Because every shortstack is given a chance under the ''fairness to all' policy, when they get down to the 5-10 BB stage. Don't believe me? Just watch it happen on every table. The sad thing is that the next big hand the shortstack gets is their last hand played.

    Just watch it happen - usually any 2 cards will do. All very random.

  • edited May 2011

    look at this lovely random hand god i could go on for hours and this is just one tourney.

    Honest another 30 hands could go on here this i'm sorry does not add up to me at all.

    JONNYGAVFC Small blind  50.00 50.00 2972.50
    whistler16 Big blind  100.00 150.00 2052.50
      Your hole cards
    • 6
    • 7
         
    dano001 Fold     
    shadow6929 Fold     
    willie Fold     
    snorky Fold     
    JONNYGAVFC Call  50.00 200.00 2922.50
    whistler16 Raise  100.00 300.00 1952.50
    JONNYGAVFC Call  100.00 400.00 2822.50
    Flop
       
    • 2
    • 7
    • 8
         
    JONNYGAVFC Check     
    whistler16 Bet  100.00 500.00 1852.50
    JONNYGAVFC Call  100.00 600.00 2722.50
    Turn
       
    • 6
         
    JONNYGAVFC Bet  600.00 1200.00 2122.50
    whistler16 Call  600.00 1800.00 1252.50
    River
       
    • 9
         
    JONNYGAVFC Check     
    whistler16 Bet  900.00 2700.00 352.50
    JONNYGAVFC Raise  1800.00 4500.00 322.50
    whistler16 All-in  352.50 4852.50 0.00
    JONNYGAVFC Unmatched bet  547.50 4305.00 870.00
    JONNYGAVFC Show
    • 8
    • 5
       
    whistler16 Show
    • K
    • A
       
    JONNYGAVFC Win Straight Flush to the 9 4305.00
    just Go's on and on and on.If this is what random is how come i have a different definition to what random is.

    the next three hands i could put up are typically straight beating straight always on the river.

    I give up.So hard to maintain a sense of humour.Time for another break  
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often? : Because every shortstack is given a chance under the ''fairness to all' policy, when they get down to the 5-10 BB stage. Don't believe me? Just watch it happen on every table. The sad thing is that the next big hand the shortstack gets is their last hand played. Just watch it happen - usually any 2 cards will do. All very random.
    Posted by elsadog
    for example /> />>>
    jojo74 Small blind  100.00 100.00 6860.00
    IRISHROVER Big blind  200.00 300.00 1942.50
      Your hole cards
    • A
    • 8
         
    BOBBYDAZLA Raise  400.00 700.00 6135.00
    HOTFLUSH66 Fold     
    heapey0015 Call  400.00 1100.00 12932.50
    jojo74 Fold     
    IRISHROVER Call  200.00 1300.00 1742.50
    Flop
       
    • Q
    • J
    • Q
         
    IRISHROVER Check     
    BOBBYDAZLA Check     
    heapey0015 Check     
    Turn
       
    • 10
         
    IRISHROVER Bet  200.00 1500.00 1542.50
    BOBBYDAZLA Raise  800.00 2300.00 5335.00
    heapey0015 Fold     
    IRISHROVER Call  600.00 2900.00 942.50
    River
       
    • K
         
    IRISHROVER All-in  942.50 3842.50 0.00
    BOBBYDAZLA Call  942.50 4785.00 4392.50
    IRISHROVER Show
    • A
    • 8
       
    BOBBYDAZLA Show
    • J
    • J
       
    BOBBYDAZLA Win Full House, Jacks and Queens 4785.00
  • edited May 2011
    Do you guys really genuinely believe that posting super standard hands proves your point???

    Alot of which r played poorly btw, v surprised at your hand Irish man.

    You got 10xbb, and flop a massive draw, get 5xbbs in when you have alot of pot equity, and the other 5xbb when u have nothing and no fold equity.

    Jam pre man! Jam the flop! Jam the turn!

    Snorky u cant.....

    1) limp in with 55 from a 6xbb stack.

    2) let yourself blind down to 1.5xbb in the small blind. Why didnt u shove any of the previous 20 hands?

    3) U played the kings fine but again you've blinded down to 5xbb's

    You really need to get your chips in with some fold equity.

    You can't get outdrawn if you make your opponents fold.

    You've almost asked for most of those out-draws, you've given your opponents no choice but to make the calls.

    And they have decent equity everytime. 

    Which means inevitably, you're gonna lose some!

    U'll prob just laugh this off and go back to blaming external things but you're much better off looking at the things u can control.

    Run better though.
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    Do you guys really genuinely believe that posting super standard hands proves your point??? Alot of which r played poorly btw, v surprised at your hand Irish man. You got 10xbb, and flop a massive draw, get 5xbbs in when you have alot of pot equity, and the other 5xbb when u have nothing and no fold equity. Jam pre man! Jam the flop! Jam the turn! Snorky u cant..... 1) limp in with 55 from a 6xbb stack. 2) let yourself blind down to 1.5xbb in the small blind. Why didnt u shove any of the previous 20 hands? 3) U played the kings fine but again you've blinded down to 5xbb's You really need to get your chips in with some fold equity. You can't get outdrawn if you make your opponents fold. You've almost asked for most of those out-draws, you've given your opponents no choice but to make the calls. And they have decent equity everytime.  Which means inevitably, you're gonna lose some! U'll prob just laugh this off and go back to blaming external things but you're much better off looking at the things u can control. Run better though.
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH

    mathamtically these super standard hands as you so call it, are rare , but online they are every other hand...

    we dont care about how we played them anymore, we just want people to understand the setup...

    it is ridiculous,on and on...never ending.......just for the purpose of equity distribution....



  • edited May 2011

    I personally think the best hand holds far too often.

    The regs recently have had massive stacks, the fish aren't getting a look in.

    I haven't seen a fish with a stack above 200xbb for the last month. It's very unlikely that the best hand should hold as much as it has been recently.

    As for not caring how bad u play, u shud. It will help you to stop losing.

    edit - not "you" personally, "you" as a group of area 51ers.
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    I personally think the best hand holds far too often. The regs recently have had massive stacks, the fish aren't getting a look in. I haven't seen a fish with a stack above 200xbb for the last month. It's very unlikely that the best hand should hold as much as it has been recently. As for not caring how bad u play, u shud. It will help you to stop losing. edit - not "you" personally, "you" as a group of area 51ers.
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    Please feel free to continue playing the 'blind man' my good friend.

    Well until that is you do indeed start to 'see'

    ;)
  • edited May 2011


    'he has no clothes on' said the little boy....


  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often? : Please feel free to continue playing the 'blind man' my good friend. Well until that is you do indeed start to 'see' ;)
    Posted by debdobs_67

    All the best players on the site r blind.

    All the professional players here r blind.

    There isn't one reg above 50nl who can see. 

    Of the 40 players on the mtt/sng leaderboards, only 1 player can see. The other 39 are blind.

    Julian Thew is blind. 

    Lolufold is blind.

    LjamesL is blind.

    DOHHHHHHH is blind.

    Blind people are clearly the best at poker ;)

    Most of the players who have goldfish bowls on skope have their eyesight though. Which is abit of a kick in the nackers really as they have to sit and look at their abysmal stats and read how much they've lost every morning!

    ;)

    Pwnd!

    ;)
  • edited May 2011
    debdob,dj, snorky and even elsa, the question i have for you is this "whats your end game?" if you write this stuff to enlighten people as to your beliefs, then you done that. if it is to try and discredit certain organisations then you done that to. if its to justify bad play,then well done ,got that covered to. but back to the original question "whats your end game? you gotta know where your taking this or theres no point starting it. you could go one step further and try and take down a site(if you want ajws number i will gladly give it to you and you can go take them on together). venting in area51 is great if that is what you want to do, and blaming things outside our control is human nature,we can all run the country better than cameron or the england football team better than capello when we down the pub with our mates. but where do you go from here, strikes outside sky shouting "we were robbed" newspaper adverts telling your stories of aa being cracked by 10 j. or you could write another 35 threads on here talking about the same old same old. if you think its wrong dont play, if  like me you think "maybe it is maybe it aint" but im enjoying playing for the sake of playing, then carry on.   phil
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    debdob,dj, snorky and even elsa, the question i have for you is this "whats your end game?" if you write this stuff to enlighten people as to your beliefs, then you done that. if it is to try and discredit certain organisations then you done that to. if its to justify bad play,then well done ,got that covered to. but back to the original question "whats your end game? you gotta know where your taking this or theres no point starting it. you could go one step further and try and take down a site(if you want ajws number i will gladly give it to you and you can go take them on together). venting in area51 is great if that is what you want to do, and blaming things outside our control is human nature,we can all run the country better than cameron or the england football team better than capello when we down the pub with our mates. but where do you go from here, strikes outside sky shouting "we were robbed" newspaper adverts telling your stories of aa being cracked by 10 j. or you could write another 35 threads on here talking about the same old same old. if you think its wrong dont play, if  like me you think "maybe it is maybe it aint" but im enjoying playing for the sake of playing, then carry on.   phil
    Posted by pod1

    Why , because it is wrong.....i dont spout nonsense,but through years of research have found out the answers to all the questions.....

    If you think that the internet was designed to fleece innocent victims out of their money ,then fine....



    but dont worry,i will not hold it against you,when it all comes out..:)


  • edited May 2011
    I have no end game. I simply give an alternate view to those who say it can't be rigged. Each time they repeat the same misinformed views that it isn't worth the site doing it, that it can't be done, that the site has a certificate and is regulated, I give a counter argument.

    I have never been one to accept what I am told without some independent thought, particularly when those telling me have everything to gain by me believing it. I make no apologies for that.

    I suppose the end game could be when DOHHHHHHH surrenders :o)
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    debdob,dj, snorky and even elsa, the question i have for you is this "whats your end game?" if you write this stuff to enlighten people as to your beliefs, then you done that. if it is to try and discredit certain organisations then you done that to. if its to justify bad play,then well done ,got that covered to. but back to the original question "whats your end game? you gotta know where your taking this or theres no point starting it. you could go one step further and try and take down a site(if you want ajws number i will gladly give it to you and you can go take them on together). venting in area51 is great if that is what you want to do, and blaming things outside our control is human nature,we can all run the country better than cameron or the england football team better than capello when we down the pub with our mates. but where do you go from here, strikes outside sky shouting "we were robbed" newspaper adverts telling your stories of aa being cracked by 10 j. or you could write another 35 threads on here talking about the same old same old. if you think its wrong dont play, if  like me you think "MAYBE IT IS,MAYBE IT AINT but im enjoying playing for the sake of playing, then carry on.   phil
    Posted by pod1
    GD point,maybe,just maybe this IS why i still play here? Still open to a bit of mischief though ;)
  • edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often?:
    In Response to Re: setups,action hands,just how often is often? : All the best players on the site r blind. All the professional players here r blind. There isn't one reg above 50nl who can see.  Of the 40 players on the mtt/sng leaderboards, only 1 player can see. The other 39 are blind. Julian Thew is blind.  Lolufold is blind. LjamesL is blind. DOHHHHHHH is blind. Blind people are clearly the best at poker ;) Most of the players who have goldfish bowls on skope have their eyesight though. Which is abit of a kick in the nackers really as they have to sit and look at their abysmal stats and read how much they've lost every morning! ;) Pwnd! ;)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    Dohhh i WILL willingly take you on any day of the week mate

    ;)
  • edited May 2011
    i know what your saying elsa, jj would be be one ell of a scalp(more chance him going to an spt mind) and i have never been a conformist never have never will, but area 51 was never set up by people who said it WASNT FIXED. as for trolling round the internet getting information about this subject dj, you could spend years doing this with aliens, ghosts and who killed jfk, and what i have found, the more you see the more you think you understand. there are 1000s of people who swear blind they have seen a ghost ,good people,honest people and yet with all the media coverage on this subject , most people dont believe in ghosts!!  phil
Sign In or Register to comment.