You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

the very last time

edited September 2011 in Area 51
I have played on skypoker since a few weeks after its launch, In that time I have seen many changes but as much as i hate to say it this last change is one too many.
As we all know and sky freely admits the hands we play when on line are enhanced and as lovers of the game we accept that fact and put up with some of the frustratingly annoying situations we find ourselves in with regards to Bad Beats as an occupational hazard and a price we pay for having 24hr a day access to the game we love. In the past I like the rest of you have groaned at the suckout and runner runner defeats and cheered when on OCCASION Ive been behind and caught a 2or 1 outer to inflict the same pain on others.
However and this is where I cant take it anymore, We now find ourselves in a situation where people are willfully and in some cases ONLY calling/jamiing from behind to win pots. This would normally be an ideal situation for any self respecting poker player of ability but i fear that the software has now gone too far in favour of the poorer player. I feel Sky are missing the bigger picture in allowing the software to reward the shocking play as reguarlaly as it does. I have played this game for 12 years now and found that only through losing my money/seat that i became a better player. When Chris Moneymaker won the wsop qualifying through pokerstars they saw their turnover go through the roof as a player with their logo was beamed into the lives of millions of poker addicts. It seems to me sky are happy with the money being generated at present but their lack of vision in not educating players to become better and maybe one day be sat opposite Ivey for a main event bracelet and  is letting down the patrons of this site. I have nothing against any of TSP, Scotty77 is a player i watched rise and occasionally advised in the early days but there seems to be a higher blind club dominating the team and i would happily put up a few of the players lower down against many of them. But these players will never get a chance to shine because skys rng doesnt give them the wins their play deserves cos they are getting it in ahead and being outdrawn a disproportionate number of times. I wont bother with my own experiences of the last 2 weeks on here because basically im sick of hearing the word "Variance" used in discussions of this nature. For those of you who know me and met me at spt events i thankyou for the games and conversations we have shared but unfortunately I would still like my poker to improve and that isnt going to happen on this site so for me its adios and goodluck and i hope sky open their eyes to the bigger picture and one day im watching you check raise ivey for the main event.
«13

Comments

  • edited September 2011
    I personally think that Sky has increased the education of the player pool here massively.  I wish I could go back 3/4 years ago as this site was an absoulte goldmine, as I'm sure you remember.

    GL on whichever site you choose to play on...I'll message you when I'm at the Vic/Empire and we can go for a drink!
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    I personally think that Sky has increased the education of the player pool here massively.  I wish I could go back 3/4 years ago as this site was an absoulte goldmine, as I'm sure you remember. GL on whichever site you choose to play on...I'll message you when I'm at the Vic/Empire and we can go for a drink!
    Posted by scotty77
    I dont doubt the honesty in your belief of skys education of players and to a point i can totally agree, With the Tv channel featuring Knowledgable Ananlysts and tips to improve play being far more readily availiable now then ever before. The problem we have is the contradiction as you yourself say 3/4 years ago this site was a goldmine for both me and you and many others and that is my main point, I will only speak for myself here by saying that the reason I managed to make the profit I did was largely down to the fact I most of the time knew where I was in the hand and when My money went in and the opponent was needing to hit i would say 6 maybe 7 out of ten he would miss despite the fact the times when he hit would infuriate me the profit on offer made it worth the annoyance. but that was 3 years ago and now those stats dont apply im lucky to win 5/10 ahead now and im not talking coin flip situations here im talking im massively ahead and runner runner is required and 5/10 is given. That is not educational to the player making the donk call. On sunday in a tourney a guy raises from 40 to 160, I have aces and re raise to 1300 he makes the call and flops 10s5s3s i hold the ace of spades he shoves me for his remaining 4k and i call he shows kd10d so hes dead to one of 2 remaining tens which of course he hit, At that point Id been on the wrong end of a few silly beats in succession and i laughed.I asked what he thought i had when he shoved hoping hed say aq or jj but no he put me on AA with 1 being a spade,when I asked why he called and shoved then knowing he was 1010 v AA with 2 cards to come and no draw his reply summed the mentality on this site "aces wont win its not hollywood enough" and that is why if you go on poker forums and review sites youll see the reputation sky currently has.In all the time Sky has been going its hovered around the same number of players in the pool on a nightly basis and its got a worse reputation among the poker community currently then ever before and thats a shame cos the layout is great the banter is great and there are some good good players here. If you want to educate people hit their pockets its simple.this software bares no relation to 3/4 years ago and it would be easy to make it better if the desire was strong enough. Your a company man now mate and like i say I dont doubt your honesty in your statement but lets face it you couldnt say otherwise even if you wanted to. By the way when we meet for a drink your buying :-)
  • edited September 2011
    I have played an enourmous amount of poker on this site over the last 3 years.  I go thru my HHs on a regular basis.  I do not think that there is anything wrong with the RnG no this site.  I see myself getting lucky and unlucky an equal amount of time.

    There are some weeks where I can't win a flip on here and others where I can't lose one...but that is the same as any other poker site.

    I play a lot on other sites too and don't notice anything different as to playing here.


  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    I have played an enourmous amount of poker on this site over the last 3 years.  I go thru my HHs on a regular basis.  I do not think that there is anything wrong with the RnG no this site.  I see myself getting lucky and unlucky an equal amount of time. There are some weeks where I can't win a flip on here and others where I can't lose one...but that is the same as any other poker site. I play a lot on other sites too and don't notice anything different as to playing here.
    Posted by scotty77
     
    And this is where we completely differ. I stated in my origianal post that all sites admit to having enhanced hands and miracle out beats are a sadly very often occurance on ALL sites, however with the current siuation at SKY it is by far and away the worst for these miracle hands. I urge all of you to go and look at Poker Rview sites and other Forums in the larger poker community and read for yourself what reputation sky currently has and make your own mind up regarding wether we are getting a rougher deal than others.As I know you know I was playing on other sites before you played your first hand of poker Scotty and feel it is from a position of strength that i make my case. Scotty where are all the players we used to play with JARVE, NEWBIE0807,FELLY11,LUKE840,FLUSH????? they are elsewhere along with 1000s of others that found playing here too extreme for the swings. These people are proper poker people and are all still playing just elsewhere which when you consider how much profit they made on here speaks volumes for the current state of affairs here.
    Look around the forums the chatboxes during play and witness the discontent at the consistentency of the best hand never holding up,Of the Unfoldable Big stack hitting miracles during early stages of MTTS,its worse now then it has ever been and I get no pleasure at all in saying that.
    Whatever site I will now generate a considerabe amount of Rake for I will experience the same enhancement but not to the level I have been experiencing of late on here.
    Scotty Im more pleased than ANY other player on here for your current staus as a TSP player as I know its something youve wanted for a long long time, but please mate you know me,I know my stuff and I can play, Sadly though it will no longer be here.
  • edited September 2011
    a well constructed and well thought out post kimble, by someone who obviously has a love of the game. a few questions i have for you though . where and when has he been stated by sky that the rng has been "enhanced". 2nd question ,obviously the game of poker has changed in the 15yrs you have been playing, live and online the subtlety of the game has diminished and be replaced by aggression, do you feel your game has adjusted to suit?. you say  "i knew where i was when the money went in" but with more players willing to gamble you will get more suckouts. the hand you mention with the aces vk10, in his mind he had tpgk and gambled. i totally agree with you the game is a lot harder than it was 5yrs ago,instead of fish there are now clever fish who all understand 3 betting, c betting , implied odds,reverse implied odds and range merging inside a yr of playing  (if they bother reading and learning).as for sites, i dont feel this is any better or worse than any other site i play on, a bit softer if i am fair. having no poker software being able to be used like holdemmanager i think is good as well. sorry you feel the way you do, like i say you sound like someone who loves the game and have been playing for a long time. just time for a "divorce " i think.  phil
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    a well constructed and well thought out post kimble, by someone who obviously has a love of the game. a few questions i have for you though . where and when has he been stated by sky that the rng has been "enhanced". 2nd question ,obviously the game of poker has changed in the 15yrs you have been playing, live and online the subtlety of the game has diminished and be replaced by aggression, do you feel your game has adjusted to suit?. you say  "i knew where i was when the money went in" but with more players willing to gamble you will get more suckouts. the hand you mention with the aces vk10, in his mind he had tpgk and gambled. i totally agree with you the game is a lot harder than it was 5yrs ago,instead of fish there are now clever fish who all understand 3 betting, c betting , implied odds,reverse implied odds and range merging inside a yr of playing  (if they bother reading and learning).as for sites, i dont feel this is any better or worse than any other site i play on, a bit softer if i am fair. having no poker software being able to be used like holdemmanager i think is good as well. sorry you feel the way you do, like i say you sound like someone who loves the game and have been playing for a long time. just time for a "divorce " i think.  phil
    Posted by pod1
    Phil first of all thankyou for understanding my love of this game,and your right the game has changed hugely in the time I have been playing with the death of "FLOP PLAYERS" reducing the skill factor involved to an all time low mores the pity. Those that know me will know I have a few temper problems and it was after one night of ridiculous beats I phoned SKY to vent my frustrations and it was during a conversation with a south african employee called OSCAR that after my venting and threats to take my custom elsewhere was told that ALL on line poker incuding SKY was enhanced,AT the time I was a rugualar Live player at Londons GUTSHOT poker club now known as THE INTERNATIONAL and had this fact confirmed by the scandinavian software developer for their own site and if i wanted to play on line it was fact i would have to accept.
    Im sorry but i cant agree with you about these clever fish you say exist here and the hand i pointed out to you as an example of ignorance highlights this lack of intelligence.In his own words "ACES WONT WIN ITS NOT HOLLYWOOD ENOUGH" I believe proves the current mentality on here.By his own admission he had me on the correct hand and if hes gambling with me being an 88.08% favourite then i should be delighted but sadly he knew what i knew when he spun his hand over that he would hit one of the 2 reamiaing 10s for the "HOLLYWOOD" hand. I learned how to play the hard way through the loss of cold hard cash,If  he misses and plays the same hand 100 times and lose 88.08 or close to it he would surely learn that actually A) I shouldnt have called the re raise effectively k high and (b) this kind of action causes me to lose more often then win.He has improved his game and can use this thought process in other areas of his play.
    That said it is his money and his right to gamble it as he sees fit,but these players are hitting this kind of draw far far too often.This feeling is not mine alone but shared by a very large number of players still here and many many more that no longer frequent the site.
    I Play on many other sites and I get no pleasure in saying that getting it in as such an overwhelming favourite and being sucked out on is very common on all other sites but I played on here for a living and if i won 60% of the large pots I played then the time invested(which at times was considerable) was worth the in-accuracy of the true odds of which i should be winning without enhancement which as i stated i am happy to accept.
    The problem is i find now on sky im only winning in the same situations 50% of pots im playing which after rake deductions means i am making little if any money on a daily weekly basis. This I am unwilling to accept this  in a crowded market with so much choice availiable.
    I have never used any poker software as I consider myself a proper poker man and software wont help me at opposite Dolyle in the wsop so ive never considered it.
    I have loved and hated this site with equal measure at times but have always came back to it due to the people and layout but sadly i feel the consistent rewarding of these players is not only intolerable to me as purist but also depriving players of learning how to play this game correctly which when done so is a thing of intelligence,skill,and beauty which i think is the biggest crime of all.
    Good Luck at the tables Phil.

  • edited September 2011
    In the cold light of day i just think that the game/players (or sore of them) have changed and that there are LOTS more players that are more than willing to just take an outright GAMBLE , even knowing they dont have the odds to do it.
  • edited September 2011
    Hi Kimble76,

    Can I ask what you mean by "sky freely admits the hands we play when on line are enhanced" and later "all sites admit to having enhanced hands"?
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    In the cold light of day i just think that the game/players (or sore of them) have changed and that there are LOTS more players that are more than willing to just take an outright GAMBLE , even knowing they dont have the odds to do it.
    Posted by debdobs_67
    The thing is Debdobs is that there are very few if any more players in the pool on here then at any time in the last 6 years and it is only the rewarding of the gamble that encourages the increase of this poor lazy poker playing. All im asking for is not even an accurate  win/loss ratio in respect of the odds but just somewhere close which would enable me to continue to use a site i have a strong fondness for and to see players of potential develop into the players i believe they can become not unlike the potential i spotted in a certain mr SCOTTY77 when he would only sit £7.77 and wouldnt fold any hand that contained a 7 in it.
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    Hi Kimble76, Can I ask what you mean by " sky freely admits the hands we play when on line are enhanced" and later "all sites admit to having enhanced hands" ?
    Posted by NoseyBonk
     Noseybonk please read my reply to POD1
    many thanks
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    In Response to Re: the very last time : Not quite pod1. This is what happened according to op: I asked what he thought i had when he shoved hoping hed say aq or jj but no he put me on AA with 1 being a spade,when I asked why he called and shoved then knowing he was 1010 v AA with 2 cards to come and no draw his reply summed the mentality on this site "aces wont win its not hollywood enough" I can see the futility of this. I just read a hand in bbv posted by MP33 in a cash game where he raises 4x with aces gets shoved on by 10-7 os and loses to 4 card str8 on board. I know that people like Dohhh etc. will come on this thread and quite rightly make the obvious, ubiquitous remarks. What i think is pertinent tho is when people deliberately do this it diminishes the game IRRESPECTIVE OF THE OUTCOME OR THE ODDS !  It offers no respect whatsoever to the people that enjoy the game and wish to play it properly so to speak. Ultimately it's their money and they can do as they please blah blah BUT if they are really not interested in doing anything other than sucking out in a mindless flip why don't they play Russian Roulette and leave tourneys and cash to those that wish to pursue the game on a higher level with the intention of learning and having fun ? Surely that is what it was designed for ? Kimble makes a few other interesting observations tho that i don't want to go into. I wouldn't be surprised if this thread got terminated. I hope not. The one word that sums it all up tho is sad.
    Posted by BLACK_MASS
    Black Mass I thankyou for your view and feel its important to state that this YOUR site and its only by stating our views be they right or wrong to the reader that discussion or change can be brought about,
    I know there will be plenty out there who agree and disagree with my view in equal measure but thats all it is.
    A view An observation and a reflection of my feelings as to how bad its got on here.
    I dont see why SKY would delete any of this thread as they or anyone else can correct me where they feel im wrong and if it does get deleted then I hope those that have read it ask them why.
    This is an important issue for all lovers of the game not just conspiracy theorists.
    Good Luck at the tables.
  • edited September 2011
    thanks for replay, sorry for not reading the hand properly,that was wrong of me. do you feel the likes of roulette and bh on sky are not helping matters, come to think of it "chip and a chair" probably not helping either. i love my poker and playing down streets rather than getting it all in pre and i normally have to go to a casino to play the games i truley like. on sunday i played in a live game 60k starting stack blinds every half an hr starting at 25/50 (proper game). after about 2hrs  1 particular player was raising everything from any position i started chatting to him to get an idea of his mind set. he never played live before and just plays online (about a year). anyway i hadnt played a hand for about 45 mins blinds were 200/400 and he opens from utg with a normal bet of his for 7k, now i seen him do this on a dozen occasions and was annoying the regs who were here for a good long game, anyway it came round to me in the bb, i jammed on him for nearly  50k, thinking unless he has kk aa he has to fold and maybe it would slow him down. snap calls with 9s lol. i asked(after he knocked me out) "what   did he put me on" "doesnt matter" he said i had a pocket pair!! i think this just about sums up the state of the game at the mo  phil
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    thanks for replay, sorry for not reading the hand properly,that was wrong of me. do you feel the likes of roulette and bh on sky are not helping matters, come to think of it "chip and a chair" probably not helping either. i love my poker and playing down streets rather than getting it all in pre and i normally have to go to a casino to play the games i truley like. on sunday i played in a live game 60k starting stack blinds every half an hr starting at 25/50 (proper game). after about 2hrs  1 particular player was raising everything from any position i started chatting to him to get an idea of his mind set. he never played live before and just plays online (about a year). anyway i hadnt played a hand for about 45 mins blinds were 200/400 and he opens from utg with a normal bet of his for 7k, now i seen him do this on a dozen occasions and was annoying the regs who were here for a good long game, anyway it came round to me in the bb, i jammed on him for nearly  50k, thinking unless he has kk aa he has to fold and maybe it would slow him down. snap calls with 9s lol. i asked(after he knocked me out) "what   did he put me on" "doesnt matter" he said i had a pocket pair!! i think this just about sums up the state of the game at the mo  phil
    Posted by pod1
    Phil no need to apologise as my posts have been rather long winded and it was easy to do.
    The mentality which sadly cost you your tourney is all too common these days and will continue to flourish while this type of play isnt punished.I have stated several times that ALL sites are encouraging this type of player not just SKY and until the software on them all returns to pre poker boom levels this will only increase.
    I am no dinosaur at 37 and will adjust my game to the player im playing regardless of on line or live and if i lose well then i lose but what the on line poker sites have created is a generation of "UNFOLDABLE'S" whos lazy and warped sense of poker play is rewarded instead of being chastiised leading to this sorry state of affairs the game we love is in. I know I'm fighting a battle I cant win and will be derided for my opinion on skys software but to sit in silence any longer while this is going on is the greater of the 2 evils.

  • edited September 2011

    This post is an educated version of " The action hands on here defy the odds".I sugguested quite some time back that this site barely resembles the site i was playing on 5 years ago.(Not the people the hands).

    I sugguested the hands were pre-made and at times it was impossible to fold even though you had a feeling you were about to be suruptitiously dumped out of the tourney by runner runner flush or a 2 outer.

    My angle was to be aware of this fact and adjust your poker accordingly, example 7 left, money is paid at 5 and you are dealt JJ UTG.This to me is final table time and your jacks will not hold up against anyone with a raggy aces and bigger chip stack.I ditch them everytime.

    People were horified and sugguested this was just AWFUL advice and i should learn how to play better poker.

    It seems to me that we all have our ways of accepting or adapting i just feel that you have to find yours mate. The site will not change, they proved this when they made even BH's rebuys it is purely about profit.

    It is still fun and far cheaper than going down the pub,I am never gonna get rich from sky poker but due to the way the hands fall now i am never going to tempted to play the bigger stake tourneys so they will not get rich from me.I only play £1-£2 games and am well over a ton up this mouth which is nice (actually 200 but 100 was cash so doesn't count)I am brilliant at cash games but seem to play them just 1 hand too long...most will understand :)

    I accept that the hands defy the odds way to often on here and because of that i do play differently... wether that's right or wrong i don't Know. My Sharkscope tells me i am playing sky Poker for free and I just love poker so i'm gonna stick around.

    sad to see you go

    Oink        

  • edited September 2011
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and mine would be if i thought the site was fixed in any way i wouldnt play here and i am amazed that so many players actually think stuff like this and continue playing !

    There is a part of the site that when you first turn it on says "log in". For those who think anything is wrong here all you have to do is just dont log in and for those who think something is wrong and still log in then you only have yourself to blame.

    The day might come when facts come out that online poker i rigged etc etc but until that day i will continue playing because my view is that it isnt fixed in anyway and if it was fixed i must be one of the luckiest players in the world because even though i have suffered countless badbeats and one outer suckouts on the river over the 7-8 years i have been playing it i have still managed to make a very good living out of playing online poker.

    What i would say though is that if anyone is dead set on the fact it is fixed then you are better off not playing the game at all because thoughts like that can only damage your own game and stop you from playing the game correctly.

    Imo the most successful online poker players are the ones who can just ride the wave when the badbeats come and continue robotlike knowing its only variance but it takes allsorts of people to make a world and not everyone is cutout to be a online poker player.

    Best of luck to everyone.

    Jenny.
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    This post is an educated version of " The action hands on here defy the odds".I sugguested quite some time back that this site barely resembles the site i was playing on 5 years ago.(Not the people the hands). I sugguested the hands were pre-made and at times it was impossible to fold even though you had a feeling you were about to be suruptitiously dumped out of the tourney by runner runner flush or a 2 outer. My angle was to be aware of this fact and adjust your poker accordingly, example 7 left, money is paid at 5 and you are dealt JJ UTG.This to me is final table time and your jacks will not hold up against anyone with a raggy aces and bigger chip stack.I ditch them everytime. People were horified and sugguested this was just AWFUL advice and i should learn how to play better poker. It seems to me that we all have our ways of accepting or adapting i just feel that you have to find yours mate. The site will not change, they proved this when they made even BH's rebuys it is purely about profit. It is still fun and far cheaper than going down the pub,I am never gonna get rich from sky poker but due to the way the hands fall now i am never going to tempted to play the bigger stake tourneys so they will not get rich from me.I only play £1-£2 games and am well over a ton up this mouth which is nice (actually 200 but 100 was cash so doesn't count)I am brilliant at cash games but seem to play them just 1 hand too long...most will understand :) I accept that the hands defy the odds way to often on here and because of that i do play differently... wether that's right or wrong i don't Know. My Sharkscope tells me i am playing sky Poker for free and I just love poker so i'm gonna stick around. sad to see you go Oink        
    Posted by snorky
    Snorky thankyou for your post, i feel your advice to fold in that position is correct, Software issues aside if ive invested the amount of time in an MTT to reach the bubble position, i want to be rewarded for the effort with at least the minimum cash win. However if Im correct in thinking your folding the JJ there because of software issues then that is a truly damning reflection on the software. If you or I or for that matter any player in the world were at wsop with the same position and hand would we make the same decision,Speaking personally I couldnt get my chips across the line quick enough.
    The truth of the matter is this that most on line players will make different decisions behind the anoynimity of a screen and the safety net of generous software than they would in real live play. I can say this because I have played many SKY poker regualars at various events live and its amazing how the fish who wont fold 47os on here wont blink without a pp or a big ace live.
    We are all on here to play poker and have fun for some not necessarily in that order but its a shame that your experiences have left you with the view you and many others have and in my opinion it doesnt have to be the case if the enhancement and miracle hits were reduced by 25%.
    As you say 5 years ago this wasnt happening, the same number of players were still in my view making ridiculous calls and i thank them for it because as SCOTTY77 stated it was a goldmine on here.
    Im afraid we will never see another IVANOVIC go through the blinds at every level to sit at £5/£10 blinds which is a pity because i know for many watching a player they played with at lower levels achieve what he did in that time inspired many to take chances and leave the comfort zone of their current blind level. because the swings due to the idiocy rewarded will frustrate them so much that (a)they wont take the chance (b)they will get fed up and go elsewhere
    Then sky will be left as they currently are with 15 tables above £1/£2 with one player sat at them because they wont play eachother and the same donks taking money off of decent players at every level from 25p/50p down.
    fun it no longer is.
    Good Luck at the Tables Snorky
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and mine would be if i thought the site was fixed in any way i wouldnt play here and i am amazed that so many players actually think stuff like this and continue playing ! There is a part of the site that when you first turn it on says "log in". For those who think anything is wrong here all you have to do is just dont log in and for those who think something is wrong and still log in then you only have yourself to blame. The day might come when facts come out that online poker i rigged etc etc but until that day i will continue playing because my view is that it isnt fixed in anyway and if it was fixed i must be one of the luckiest players in the world because even though i have suffered countless badbeats and one outer suckouts on the river over the 7-8 years i have been playing it i have still managed to make a very good living out of playing online poker. What i would say though is that if anyone is dead set on the fact it is fixed then you are better off not playing the game at all because thoughts like that can only damage your own game and stop you from playing the game correctly. Imo the most successful online poker players are the ones who can just ride the wave when the badbeats come and continue robotlike knowing its only variance but it takes allsorts of people to make a world and not everyone is cutout to be a online poker player. Best of luck to everyone. Jenny.
    Posted by jenny_IYY
    Thanks Jenny but i feel youve missed my point,so i will say it again ALL poker sites use enhanced hands I am in no way singling out sky poker in this practice.I would ask you again to read all my posts.
    Your right i like everyone else do not have to play here as it isnt the only game in town but one enhanced site for another where my 90% hand gets outdrawn to runner runner comes down to preference and i like all ther aspects of the Sky set up so this has been my site of choice.
    I would like you to define your term of fixed as it isnt a term i have used or accused any site of,My issue has been of a FACT in that enhancement exists in all on line poker but feel the enhancement here has reached for me personally an unacceptable level.
    with respect to riding the wave i have taken many thousands from this site and believe me I can ride with the best of em when its my mistake or being beat a statistically proportionate time to the odds of the hand.
    as for not everyone is cut out to be an online poker player you are correct but I am one and was for a living for around 6 years. This is the place Ive enjoyed playing the most watching SCOTTY,DAVEYZZ,GERARD9,SHARKSBITE,and many others ive been fortunate and privelleged enough to go through the blinds with makes it hard for me to leave but feel the current status qou needs addressing.
    I wish you luck and I thankyou for your comment but like I say this is my view and though i wish I could convince you and others so that the shout is loud enough to be heard by those that have the power to change it,I accept that I cant and as theo pappithis would say "and for that reason I'm out"
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and mine would be if i thought the site was fixed in any way i wouldnt play here and i am amazed that so many players actually think stuff like this and continue playing ! There is a part of the site that when you first turn it on says "log in". For those who think anything is wrong here all you have to do is just dont log in and for those who think something is wrong and still log in then you only have yourself to blame. The day might come when facts come out that online poker i rigged etc etc but until that day i will continue playing because my view is that it isnt fixed in anyway and if it was fixed i must be one of the luckiest players in the world because even though i have suffered countless badbeats and one outer suckouts on the river over the 7-8 years i have been playing it i have still managed to make a very good living out of playing online poker. What i would say though is that if anyone is dead set on the fact it is fixed then you are better off not playing the game at all because thoughts like that can only damage your own game and stop you from playing the game correctly. Imo the most successful online poker players are the ones who can just ride the wave when the badbeats come and continue robotlike knowing its only variance but it takes allsorts of people to make a world and not everyone is cutout to be a online poker player. Best of luck to everyone. Jenny.
    Posted by jenny_IYY
    If you read all the posts you will see a discussion that hands are "enhanced" on all poker sites apparently.
    Sounds like polititian speak to me ...trying to find a word like enhanced but not enhanced ...changed erm no, interfered with erm no, ajusted erm no, Fixed that's the one.Is a fruit machine random? no but do i still play it yes, can i still win on it yes I can.

    My point and has always been the same,the cards are not fixed in anyones favour (ergo you could argue site is not fixed at all), but that the cards are not truly random 100000000 or more pre made hands many of which will induce action.You can fold or raise and utimately bet size will have a massive impact on the outcome but if for instance the true odds of quads is say 1000000/1 and you see them on average every 250,000 hands for a year something somewhere has been enhanced.Not in my favour not in your favour but enhanced all the same.

    I hope you agree that this would takeaway some of the advantage that skill and experience have if the hands are enhanced in anyway at all.
    I just agree with others that the hands defy the odds far too often too be considered free from any sort of programming.Yet again only my opiniion, i have been wrong lots before and on the positive side i absolutely had exactly the same opinion as you have and did for quite some time.Sky is not rigged towards anyone and is fun, I play and will continue playing.I like the word enhanced it brilliant.

    snorky         
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    In Response to Re: the very last time : If you read all the posts you will see a discussion that hands are "enhanced" on all poker sites apparently. Sounds like polititian speak to me ...trying to find a word like enhanced but not enhanced ...changed erm no, interfered with erm no, ajusted erm no, Fixed that's the one.Is a fruit machine random? no but do i still play it yes, can i still win on it yes I can. My point and has always been the same,the cards are not fixed in anyones favour (ergo you could argue site is not fixed at all), but that the cards are not truly random 100000000 or more pre made hands many of which will induce action.You can fold or raise and utimately bet size will have a massive impact on the outcome but if for instance the true odds of quads is say 1000000/1 and you see them on average every 250,000 hands for a year something somewhere has been enhanced.Not in my favour not in your favour but enhanced all the same. I hope you agree that this would takeaway some of the advantage that skill and experience have if the hands are enhanced in anyway at all. I just agree with others that the hands defy the odds far too often too be considered free from any sort of programming.Yet again only my opiniion, i have been wrong lots before and on the positive side i absolutely had exactly the same opinion as you have and did for quite some time.Sky is not rigged towards anyone and is fun, I play and will continue playing.I like the word enhanced it brilliant. snorky         
    Posted by snorky
    I think that this article is probablly the closest to the truth.  It may help to explain why i lost to quads 3 times in 15 minutes yesterday in 2 multitable sngs on Pstars, in all in preflop hands with overpair. 
    On the other hand, perhaps this is just variance and they were all due within a 15 miute period?  lol
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    In Response to Re: the very last time : I think that this article is probablly the closest to the truth.  It may help to explain why i lost to quads 3 times in 15 minutes yesterday in 2 multitable sngs on Pstars, in all in preflop hands with overpair.  On the other hand, perhaps this is just variance and they were all due within a 15 miute period?  lol
    Posted by 9se7enTr3y
      Forgot to add, i flopped set in one of them with qq (flop all same suit) to lose to runner runner quad jacks (instead of his flopped flush draw!  (insult to injury)
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    Hi again Kimble. I've been giving what you said some thought so here goes. On the subject of the AA vs. K-10. You are obviously a bit frustrated at present. It's one thing to be sucked out on but another where you feel people can legitimately take shots at doing this because all too often the odds of such occurrences are not being truly represented. If you suspect, or even have evidence as in your case, that odds in online poker are 'modified' then seeing someone tell you, "aces wont win its not hollywood enough," psychologically, can be very damaging. Especially if this is coupled with a period of negative variance. To be honest if you want to mess up a lot of players heads or at least upset them then it's this sort of remark that is specifically designed to do it. Ultimately this incidence is not to be taken literally. The oppo didn't KNOW that his 2-outer was good here and lots of people can post lots of evidence that suggests the contrary. Unfortunately we cannot correlate enough data to take a firm view one way or the other. In this case tho i can see that this was the straw that broke the camels back so to speak as you felt it was evidence that a player was adapting to suck out play on purpose. To be fair tho he had the benefit of retrospect, seeing as he did suck out. You must therefore view this as proof of your opponent being a nasty piece of work playing head games rather than anything else. Still a bit disturbing nonetheless. Chatbox off methinks. OK i don't wish you to think that i am necessarily disputing your views here so bare with me. You have obviously a great deal of experience playing poker both live and online. I can FULLY understand anyone that can exercise the right to question ANYTHING. Personally i have felt that online poker was enhanced since i started playing. I have spent nearly the entirety of my poker life on American sites. I haven't been on Sky for long enough to make up my mind. But from what i've seen Sky is different to UB and Doyles. It plays different and i haven't seen the pattern yet. So, i can't talk about Sky. I can say tho i adapted my game on other sites successfully. It just took a little common sense nothing else. In this respect generally as an overview of what i have seen of the industry i do concur with you and say there are modifications to play. Thirdly i have noted a great shift in playing styles of late. The lazy word you use can pretty much sum things up. People seem to call down light against the odds with 2nd and 3rd pair a lot more now. If they are raising with these hands in position then i wouldn't mind so much but this is seldom the case. They seem to want to hit trips or 2 pair. It's bad and over time will yield only loss. Putting a person on A-K missed in a raised pot pre flop every hand simply doesn't wash. It's just mindless. A similar thing can be said about flush draws. People seem to think that flopping ANY flush draw is a ticket to the nutz and stacking someone. This is blase bs full stop. I have yet to see analysts on 865 try to discourage people to play flush draws in any other way than with fatalistic aggression. However if you play cash everyday like this you will lose a lot over time. People just  (don't) think oh well i got fold equity too so who gives a frick, it's standard,obv. Either people don't understand flush draw probability or don't really care. Either way a bit sad. Same can be said of o/e straight draws. I can understand you are feeling cynical at the moment. I'm sure that from time to time even the idiots of this world do to. Those that can't or won't question are generally idiots as a rule. Maybe LAG lazy play has corrupted poker ? Maybe there are modifiers to the software ? Maybe it is more gambling than people cared to think ? All these factors enhancing variance :( Whatever you do tho i hope you continue to play and take a little time to consider what you feel, why you feel it and then devise a constructive counter. GL man.
    Posted by BLACK_MASS
    Thanks mate I appreciate the sentiment but this wasnt the hand that made me tilt it was the hand that stopped me!!!! I had had 3 flopped sets (2AA,1KK) beaten in the 10 minutes prior to runner runner quads twice!!!! and a runner runner straight so was steaming going into the hand but laughing after it especially after the explanaition he gave.I would also point out that the idiot was stacked by my jj roughly 8 hands after.
    It was a sequence of what happened in the 2 week period prior,his explanation for his actions and a hand that knocked me out of a bounty hunter on monday night that led me to this decision to leave.
    a raise from 50 to 300 was made by PEG1 in my view (and it is just my view) a player i have many notes on none of which are too complimentary shall we say.I call with KQos from SB and BB also calls.FLOP is 10 J A rainbow as i sit pondering how i get paid here PEG1 shoves he has 75 chips more than me and the player in the BB.I call with nuts and find the player behind also calls for his stack and bounty.
    Now lets face it this is dream stuff for any player the cards come over and to my disappointment the bb caller also has KQ still we are taking PEG1 out and as i have 50 more than bb im getting a bounty!!!!!!
    NO im not PEg had raised and shoved on that flop with Kd3d, hands up waht the next 2 cards were??????
    yep 4d 7d making a running flush for yet another player with no concept of poker he gets 9k and 2 bounties and that was the one that broke the camels back.
    I believe in my poker ability and would like most others who play back myself against any opponent in a pure game but it was becoming increasingly obvious that the enhancement was too tilted in favour of the idiots(again just my view im sure PEG1 is a lovely person and maybe very bright away from the table) and dare i say it but i was also noticing in hands I was in and Hands I wasnt in that the first person to raise was hitting miracles an awful lot.
    I love this game and no donks or software will ever stop me from playing but what they will do is stop me from playing here sadly.
    as you said a divorce is now unavoidable but like all divorcing couples theres the what to do with the kids being left behind and i could have just gone and said nothing on here but there are too many good players and players whos play deserves better than they are getting through no fault of their own.
    Good Luck mate.
  • edited September 2011
    i disagree with your thinking of peg,i played live with him at dusk till down last week, never met him till then although i have seen him play many times on master cash nl300. nice guy ,definatly. very up on the game ,yes. plays slightly off centre,most derifinatly as do most nl300 players. making good money, from all accounts, bundles. so i read your other posts with interest and intrigue,this one i dont.
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    i disagree with your thinking of peg,i played live with him at dusk till down last week, never met him till then although i have seen him play many times on master cash nl300. nice guy ,definatly. very up on the game ,yes. plays slightly off centre,most derifinatly as do most nl300 players. making good money, from all accounts, bundles. so i read your other posts with interest and intrigue,this one i dont.
    Posted by pod1
    as i said this is just my view and a view made by playing with peg1 over an 18 month period daily for hours on 50p/1 i mean no disrespect to peg1 whatsoever who as you rightly point out makes good money on here,I would be interested if you knew if PEG1 jammed all in with k3 into the same flop Live at DTD!!!!! cos my betting is that he wouldnt. Like I say this is just my opinion and may not be one shared by other players he has played against and I dont want my notes on any particualar player to overshadow the serious point im making regarding the standard of play and the rewards gained for playing in this manner.I only included this example and only named the player involved as it seems most people on these threads want proof of claims of hands played,It was in no way meant in a detrimental way to him.
  • edited September 2011
    Hi again.  When you say all sites admit to enhancing hands etc where do you get this info from ?

    I am amazed to here this if it is right as i was under the total impression that everything was supposed to be random or as close to random as something man made could be ?

    Sorry if i came across as being harsh and none feeling for you but over the years i have seen and heard so many players saying sites are fixed and things like "when they withdraw cash they lose etc etc" that i just think to myself why do you even play then ?

    Obvi there will be a small % of those players like yourself who are winning players and have just had enough of the badbeats etc or like in your case believe it to be happening for some other reason but i have to look at my own experiance online and ive played alot of different sites over the years and apart from when i was just learning the game i have made cash at about the same ratio whichever site i have been on, so for me saying one is better than another just dosnt seem right unless you were speaking of the graphics and table layouts etc but not the actual enhancment of hands.

    You seem a very clued up guy and i also think your puting this on here in order to help others and bring what you believe to be right to peoples attention but from my side of things like i said in other post ive done well online over the years and in the short time ive played on sky have also done well here and i feel that if somethings not broken why try to fix it.

    If anything i would say sky is better than the others because its the only site ive ever seen where they actually take the time to try and help players to become better players so leaving this site would be -EV imo.

    I wish you the best of luck though and like i said this is only my opinion

    Jenny.x.
  • edited September 2011
    no problem kimble,maybe i was looking at it wrong. a friend and i play golf, we played in a 4 recently. he is a 3 handicap and i am a 14. on one of the tees i hooke left outta bounds "haha snap hook and gone" said one of the other plays. my friend steps up and hits almost the identiacl shot. "unlucky james,a nice high draw that as well" a bit miffed i turned round and asked what the b l o dd y difference was " he said "1 was played by a lower handicapper and the other by a high 1"
  • edited September 2011
    During the summer, I spent basically a whole month playing live poker in Vegas and didn't play a hand online.

    On my second day in Vegas, I got it in with AA v KK and QQ aipf. Raggy board Q turn K river :(  After that hand decided to go to another poker room and have a walk around etc. I then decided on going to the Venetian.  First hand I sit down I get AA aipf v KK and QQ.  Raggy board Q turn K river.

    One room I played in had a 'high hand jackpot....think to qualify it was quads or better using both hole cards.

    Man scoops with 22 on a 22K flop.  Gets 100$ for his good fortune.

    The very next hand he has 22 on a 22Q flop.  Gets another 100$

    5 mins later the lady next to him flops a straight flush with T6cc.

    20 mins later I flop quad 9s with 99.

    Then the same lady who flopped a straight flush then rivered a royal flush.

    These happened with an hour.  I played in this room for probably another 20 hours or so during my stay and didn't see another high hand winner.

    I saw loads of 'action' hands when I was out there...no more frequent on infrequent than online.

    lol @ 7.77 I was such a fish :(
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    Hi again.  When you say all sites admit to enhancing hands etc where do you get this info from ? I am amazed to here this if it is right as i was under the total impression that everything was supposed to be random or as close to random as something man made could be ? Sorry if i came across as being harsh and none feeling for you but over the years i have seen and heard so many players saying sites are fixed and things like "when they withdraw cash they lose etc etc" that i just think to myself why do you even play then ? Obvi there will be a small % of those players like yourself who are winning players and have just had enough of the badbeats etc or like in your case believe it to be happening for some other reason but i have to look at my own experiance online and ive played alot of different sites over the years and apart from when i was just learning the game i have made cash at about the same ratio whichever site i have been on, so for me saying one is better than another just dosnt seem right unless you were speaking of the graphics and table layouts etc but not the actual enhancment of hands. You seem a very clued up guy and i also think your puting this on here in order to help others and bring what you believe to be right to peoples attention but from my side of things like i said in other post ive done well online over the years and in the short time ive played on sky have also done well here and i feel that if somethings not broken why try to fix it. If anything i would say sky is better than the others because its the only site ive ever seen where they actually take the time to try and help players to become better players so leaving this site would be -EV imo. I wish you the best of luck though and like i said this is only my opinion Jenny.x.
    Posted by jenny_IYY
    Jenny I greatly welcome your opinion, In my origianl reply to POD1 i do state and name how and where I have this information from. I'm sure some employee from sky has read this thread is welcome to contradict my claims and say that the information given by an employee of theirs was eronious and that the softeware developer at gutshot was stringing me along with answers to the questions i raised with him. If you look at the responses from people to this thread I think you'll see that Im far from alone with this in the disbelievers view Hypothesis.
    Its the people on here as well as the layout and the incredible amount of bad calls made here that kept me here for so long and the banter i enjoyed on tables with the likes of SCOTTY for 12 hours a day that made playing here the happiest of my poker life.
    Sky owe me nothing they have provided me with fantastic moments and a considerably healthier bank balance than i ever thought it would when i started here and I say this as i would to any old friend whos in danger of missing the bigger picture please stop with the madness before this place and the people who frequent it get to a stage where it and they disappear.
    Too many good players have left and been replaced with people who need educating and as i said to SCOTTY  Sky in my view lead the on line poker world in the respect of the coverage and help you can get. But all the analysts,pros,and guests in the world dont seem to be able to get these people to fold or think about what they are doing when sat at these tables and because despite all the advice given these people are winning and when your winning you dont change your play and when your winning with luck your missing the fundamentals of a game which in my opinion is 85% skill and 15% luck this sadly doesnt translate to what we are witnessing.
    best of luck to you Jenny your opinion even if different is greatly respected.
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    During the summer, I spent basically a whole month playing live poker in Vegas and didn't play a hand online. On my second day in Vegas, I got it in with AA v KK and QQ aipf. Raggy board Q turn K river :(  After that hand decided to go to another poker room and have a walk around etc. I then decided on going to the Venetian.  First hand I sit down I get AA aipf v KK and QQ.  Raggy board Q turn K river. One room I played in had a 'high hand jackpot....think to qualify it was quads or better using both hole cards. Man scoops with 22 on a 22K flop.  Gets 100$ for his good fortune. The very next hand he has 22 on a 22Q flop.  Gets another 100$ 5 mins later the lady next to him flops a straight flush with T6cc. 20 mins later I flop quad 9s with 99. Then the same lady who flopped a straight flush then rivered a royal flush. These happened with an hour.  I played in this room for probably another 20 hours or so during my stay and didn't see another high hand winner. I saw loads of 'action' hands when I was out there...no more frequent on infrequent than online. lol @ 7.77 I was such a fish :(
    Posted by scotty77
    Again your missing the point I have clearly stated I have no problem with the enhancement I understand the need for it and totally accept it,No one wants to be playing 20 hands an hour.All of us here want to play thats why we are here my argument is stop letting the miracle hand outdraw the heavy favourite as often as it currently does.I have also stated I dont even expect the same percentage of times the odds say a hand should hold but somewhere close. Please Please understand where im coming from. Its been enhanced since i started and fell in love with it i accept it and embrace it warts and all but not to the point of ridiculousness.When you have poker players scared of getting big hands and their first thought isnt "great im getting paid" but "I'm going to get done here" somethings very very wrong and lets face it EVERYONE of us has had that thought process at some time.
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    In Response to Re: the very last time : Not quite pod1. This is what happened according to op: I asked what he thought i had when he shoved hoping hed say aq or jj but no he put me on AA with 1 being a spade,when I asked why he called and shoved then knowing he was 1010 v AA with 2 cards to come and no draw his reply summed the mentality on this site "aces wont win its not hollywood enough" I can see the futility of this. I just read a hand in bbv posted by MP33 in a cash game where he raises 4x with aces gets shoved on by 10-7 os and loses to 4 card str8 on board. I know that people like Dohhh etc. will come on this thread and quite rightly make the obvious, ubiquitous remarks. What i think is pertinent tho is when people deliberately do this it diminishes the game IRRESPECTIVE OF THE OUTCOME OR THE ODDS !  It offers no respect whatsoever to the people that enjoy the game and wish to play it properly so to speak. Ultimately it's their money and they can do as they please blah blah BUT if they are really not interested in doing anything other than sucking out in a mindless flip why don't they play Russian Roulette and leave tourneys and cash to those that wish to pursue the game on a higher level with the intention of learning and having fun ? Surely that is what it was designed for ? Kimble makes a few other interesting observations tho that i don't want to go into. I wouldn't be surprised if this thread got terminated. I hope not. The one word that sums it all up tho is sad.
    Posted by BLACK_MASS

     
    Posts: 305
    First: 2/5/2010
    Last: 20/9/2011

    Hand History #416362089 (18:45 20/09/2011)

    PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
    Mr_Blonde Small blind   150.00 150.00 2555.00
    Ross88 Big blind   300.00 450.00 5730.00
      Your hole cards
    • J
    • 7
         
    AJW1976 Raise   1200.00 1650.00 7295.00
    Yorkie74 Fold        
    DISCO245 Fold        
    Dancbear Fold        
    Mr_Blonde Fold        
    Ross88 Raise   2700.00 4350.00 3030.00
    AJW1976 All-in   7295.00 11645.00 0.00
    Ross88 All-in   3030.00 14675.00 0.00
    AJW1976 Unmatched bet   2465.00 12210.00 2465.00
    Ross88 Show
    • A
    • A
         
    AJW1976 Show
    • J
    • 7
         
    Flop
       
    • K
    • 10
    • 4
         
    Turn
       
    • Q
         
    River
       
    • 9
         
    AJW1976 Win Straight to the King 12210.00   14675.00




  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: the very last time:
    In Response to Re: the very last time : Well that settles everything. There is never anything to question ever. Thanks for clarifying the issue. Your friend has maybe a mental condition and should be pitied ? Clearly there is nothing to be gained from random events if you are running a business.Business practice has always been totally transparent and obvious to those with half a mind throughout human history  Discussion over. Thanx man and apologies jenny_iyy. Was obvious and this guy is lying about the phone call.
    Posted by BLACK_MASS
    Im sorry mate but dont understand your last post and im really hoping you arent implying i was lieing????????
Sign In or Register to comment.