He prolly has got f all, but a check call with nine high? Mr offshoot, you sir are *'ing crackers. Rather shove than call lol least he'll fold king high flushes draws or similar hands.
I think you've left the name in on the first instance Shoot.
Well the line makes no sense from the villain. They represent very little. Maybe a slow played 7 after limp/calling pre with A7s or some connector with a 7. JsXs maybe too. Many more draws in their range, busted straight and flush draws. Plus I guess they could be calling down with a pair lower than sixes and pot to steal after being counterfeited.
However, we have 9 high with the two pair on board. If they are as your reads have them do we beat enough of their bluffs? It'll be a sick call Shoot, I think you're ahead some of the time but not enough IMO.
I think you've left the name in on the first instance Shoot. Well the line makes no sense from the villain. They represent very little. Maybe a slow played 7 after limp/calling pre with A7s or some connector with a 7. JsXs maybe too. Many more draws in their range, busted straight and flush draws. Plus I guess they could be calling down with a pair lower than sixes and pot to steal after being counterfeited. However, we have 9 high with the two pair on board. If they are as your reads have them do we beat enough of their bluffs? It'll be a sick call Shoot, I think you're ahead some of the time but not enough IMO. Better spots on the horizon probably. Posted by TommyD
+1
I think the main problem here is we are behind to some of there bluffs aswell as there value betting hands. However, I would assume he checks back 88-1010 on the river aswell as an busted A high flush draw and possibly k high. He MAY also check back the river with 66 thinking your checking to induce a bluff with his missed draws and random floats. When we take all this into consideration I think he will show up will underpairs and 45 a fair amount of the time, just not enough to justify a call against a random unkown.
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : No thanks. I prefer to just play this poker thing every once in a while. I think i'm nearly getting the hang of it. Posted by offshoot
surely you should consider the reverse implied odds if you call and he flips Q10 of spades.. Surely you would be on crazy tilt. Just put it in no need to show off.
Mr Beane I dunno why your being so abusive to Mr Shoot, but i guess u guys have got some sik history sure is entertaining tho...:) Posted by GREGHOGG
It's hardly a good thread or a realistic hand considering how stupidly tight he plays, as if he's calling here, let alone the fact calling is so lol moronic it shows he has no grasp of what he's doing. (whole hand is well played imo).
Let's go and continue discussing all his previous excellent strat posts. oh wait n/m sure happens. Obviously he's posted so much good content I couldn't see it.
I thought beaneh was joking? It's hard to tell in text! Can you please insert some happy or sad smiley's so I know if you are angry or not? Posted by donkeyplop
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : It's hardly a good thread or a realistic hand considering how stupidly tight he plays, as if he's calling here, let alone the fact calling is so lol moronic it shows he has no grasp of what he's doing. (whole hand is well played imo). Let's go and continue discussing all his previous excellent strat posts. oh wait n/m sure happens. Obviously he's posted so much good content I couldn't see it. Posted by beaneh
I dont know what im doing so posting strat would be counterproductive.
I didnt post the hand looking for an answer. I just thought it might generate discussion.
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : I dont know what im doing so posting strat would be counterproductive. I didnt post the hand looking for an answer. I just thought it might generate discussion. Posted by offshoot
Yeah theres no way you can justify calling here against a random unkown but it is interesting to hear yours and others thoughts.
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : So your telling me after all this 9 high wasnt good v a guy whos called us 2 streets. I must got and re-read/watch every holdem post/book/progromme i can find and re-understand poker. I always rhought 9 high was the nuts. Posted by The_Don90
Comments
Call £3.00£7.50£943.13offshootRaise £10.50£18.00£357.47zingFold villain
Call £9.00£27.00£934.13Flop 767 offshootBet £18.00£45.00£339.47villain
Call £18.00£63.00£916.13Turn J offshootBet £45.00£108.00£294.47villain
Call £45.00£153.00£871.13River J offshootCheck villain
Bet £153.00£306.00£718.13offshootCall?
Well the line makes no sense from the villain. They represent very little. Maybe a slow played 7 after limp/calling pre with A7s or some connector with a 7. JsXs maybe too. Many more draws in their range, busted straight and flush draws. Plus I guess they could be calling down with a pair lower than sixes and pot to steal after being counterfeited.
However, we have 9 high with the two pair on board. If they are as your reads have them do we beat enough of their bluffs? It'll be a sick call Shoot, I think you're ahead some of the time but not enough IMO.
Better spots on the horizon probably.
Assume villan had a counterfitted baby PP if so.
I think the main problem here is we are behind to some of there bluffs aswell as there value betting hands.
However, I would assume he checks back 88-1010 on the river aswell as an busted A high flush draw and possibly k high. He MAY also check back the river with 66 thinking your checking to induce a bluff with his missed draws and random floats. When we take all this into consideration I think he will show up will underpairs and 45 a fair amount of the time, just not enough to justify a call against a random unkown.
surely you should consider the reverse implied odds if you call and he flips Q10 of spades.. Surely you would be on crazy tilt. Just put it in no need to show off.
Mr Beane
I dunno why your being so abusive to Mr Shoot, but i guess u guys have got some sik history
sure is entertaining tho...:)
It's hard to tell in text!
Can you please insert some happy or sad smiley's so I know if you are angry or not?
I didnt post the hand looking for an answer. I just thought it might generate discussion.
I must got and re-read/watch every holdem post/book/progromme i can find and re-understand poker. I always rhought 9 high was the nuts.