You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Changes to cash games

13

Comments

  • edited May 2010

    I In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : people r giving ideas to improve the site/ make higher traffic, i don't mean to be rude but post something constructive or not at all. please don't bring your personal grudge with ajs onto this thread.
    Posted by freechips1
    I cant understand what he was saying, but I'm guessing it was negative. So +1
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
       I for one am happy as the cash tables are why change it   dtw
    Posted by DTWBANDIT

    +1
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : people r giving ideas to improve the site/ make higher traffic, i don't mean to be rude but post something constructive or not at all. please don't bring your personal grudge with ajs onto this thread.
    Posted by freechips1
    what the flop are you on about?
  • edited May 2010
    boycott this site unless i am reimbursed my £45

    good luck with that
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    Cash games here are a joke and am getting increasingly peed off with being riddled out of my money by constant suckouts. KK dealt twice within 3 hands and surprise surprise massively ahead and i lose both.  The second time the usual pair vs pair scenario and the lower hits set on the river. This is ruining poker, this is quite clealy not random as it happens all the time and i boycott this site unless i am reimbursed my £45 Massivley disgruntled Johnnyh1
    Posted by Johnnyh
    KK lost twice? In 3 hands?

    I think you should be on the phone to 999 mate - you woz robbed!
  • edited May 2010
    I'm starting to get really annoyed with people that double up and run away as soon as they do, it can be really infuriating, especially heads up. It's not allowed in a live game and shouldn't online either, i think there should be a ten minute rule to leave if you are up on starting money.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    I'm starting to get really annoyed with people that double up and run away as soon as they do, it can be really infuriating, especially heads up. It's not allowed in a live game and shouldn't online either, i think there should be a ten minute rule to leave if you are up on starting money.
    Posted by kirstii
    Really?
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    I'm starting to get really annoyed with people that double up and run away as soon as they do, it can be really infuriating, especially heads up. It's not allowed in a live game and shouldn't online either, i think there should be a ten minute rule to leave if you are up on starting money.
    Posted by kirstii
    I don't want to take sides on this one, as I'm ambivelant to the issue personally, but it IS "allowed" in Live poker. It is frowned upon by some, exactly as it is by some Online, but it is deffo allowed.

    PS - Thank you for your lovely PM, really appreciated.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : Really?
    Posted by MereNovice
    Yip, 15 minute rule at the alea on saturday
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : Yip, 15 minute rule at the alea on saturday
    Posted by kirstii
    That's a remarkable situation and is surely an exception rather than the rule.
    It seems wholly unworkable in any reasonable card room too.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : I don't want to take sides on this one, as I'm ambivelant to the issue personally, but it IS "allowed" in Live poker. It is frowned upon by some, exactly as it is by some Online, but it is deffo allowed. PS - Thank you for your lovely PM, really appreciated.
    Posted by Tikay10
    Is it really? Ah see i was told that was the rule on Saturday, i bow to your knowledge and experience!
    And no probs about the PM.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : That's a remarkable situation and is surely an exception rather than the rule. It seems wholly unworkable in any reasonable card room too.
    Posted by MereNovice
    Well there's no way the alea is a reasonable card room lol
  • edited May 2010
    Can we stop derailing an important thread?

    Double up and run/ratholing can't be stopped online so don't even bother wasting time debating this.

    Short stacking and other issues posted are much more important and need to be addressed.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    Can we stop derailing an important thread? Double up and run/ratholing can't be stopped online so don't even bother wasting time debating this. Short stacking and other issues posted are much more important and need to be addressed.
    Posted by zing

    If you rathole live it's your perogative, but everyone can see you as you skulk out, whereas online I don't even consider it a hit and run. Most places at least (like sky) have the rules where you cant sit back down with less than you sat with if you've played in the last hour or so. 
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
       I for one am happy as the cash tables are why change it   dtw
    Posted by DTWBANDIT
    +1
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : If you rathole live it's your perogative, but everyone can see you as you skulk out, whereas online I don't even consider it a hit and run. Most places at least (like sky) have the rules where you cant sit back down with less than you sat with if you've played in the last hour or so. 
    Posted by beaneh
    I don't know how it can't annoy you. If there is one thing that really annoys me, its Hit n Runner's. 

    It's bad when they just quit and not play anywhere, but when you see them join another table with 20bb's it sorta sends me into spew mode (Though you prob don't know difference)
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : I don't know how it can't annoy you. If there is one thing that really annoys me, its Hit n Runner's.  It's bad when they just quit and not play anywhere, but when you see them join another table with 20bb's it sorta sends me into spew mode (Though you prob don't know difference)
    Posted by Cowgomoo

    You never know how many hands someone will play, it's online it's not face to face there is nothing to lose by sitting out after a big win and many people who sit in with short money are making a pretty sensible decision standing.  It may be bad for you but so what? It's no reason to tilt.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : You never know how many hands someone will play, it's online it's not face to face there is nothing to lose by sitting out after a big win and many people who sit in with short money are making a pretty sensible decision standing.  It may be bad for you but so what? It's no reason to tilt.
    Posted by beaneh
    OK I can understand that, but why is it not OK to do it live?
  • edited May 2010
    brilliant once again the pros on here dont like it when there bread and butter wages (amateur shortstackers) actually have the nerve to leave a table

    great stuff
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    brilliant once again the pros on here dont like it when there bread and butter wages (amateur shortstackers) actually have the nerve to leave a table great stuff
    Posted by barnsie
    I'm sorry, what?
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games : OK I can understand that, but why is it not OK to do it live?
    Posted by Cowgomoo

    You have to walk into the casino, get on the list, sit in the game, win a big pot, then have the nerve; to walk over to the cashier, change up, walk out the place and drive home etc etc 

    Online you click stand and you're gone, it's so much more impersonal. When people arrive live they'll often be like oh i've driven up from xyz so you know they wont be leaving after one hand etc etc. 
  • edited May 2010
    What is floppin wrong with it is what I'd like to know-- you all seem to think there is something inherently wrong with the fact that someone can win some floppin cash, and leave the table without giving you a chance to get it back---lol---I very often triple up and leave the table, and I consider it good sound strategy to do so-- so there!

                          NER NER NA NER NER!!
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    What is floppin wrong with it is what I'd like to know-- you all seem to think there is something inherently wrong with the fact that someone can win some floppin cash, and leave the table without giving you a chance to get it back---lol---I very often triple up and leave the table, and I consider it good sound strategy to do so-- so there!                       NER NER NA NER NER!!
    Posted by oynutter
    Yeah and you flop royal flushes as well dont ya? dont ya? lol dav
  • edited May 2010
    YEH!!---NER NER NA NER NER!!
  • edited May 2010
    Bump to get back to original discussion. (Bigger min buyin and sitting out limit)
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    Bump to get back to original discussion. (Bigger min buyin and sitting out limit)
    Posted by Cowgomoo
    +1, & thanks Mr Moo.
  • edited May 2010
    People need to understand this thread isn't about bashing shortstackers.

    It's just shortstacks of 10BB's is taking it to the extreme.

    20BB minimum would be a step forward, if not completely satisfactory.
  • edited May 2010
    anyword from the suits? a auto top up to 100bb is a great idea
  • edited May 2010

    Hi Free.

    No, but I've not chased them this week, as Bernie is on Holiday, & they have had their hands full with some new "releases". Rebuys & add-ons arrived today, & something else equally important is "very imminent", so I thought it best not to trouble them overly.

    But I'll re-send the Thread to them now.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Changes to cash games:
    Hi Free. No, but I've not chased them this week, as Bernie is on Holiday, & they have had their hands full with some new "releases". Rebuys & add-ons arrived today, & something else equally important is "very imminent", so I thought it best not to trouble them overly. But I'll re-send the Thread to them now.
    Posted by Tikay10
    Could you check your PM's if you're not too busy please. You told me to PM you about it a few days ago

    Thanks :)
Sign In or Register to comment.