Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
Appauling chat etiquette on the bubble on VLV ft.
I'm gutted at finishing 6th so bubbling must feel horrible. Didn't see chips before just the result so can't comment on the chat too much but i'm guessing he can't be far off insta calling any 2 cards after raising.
I know it feels sh%t mate but we get our seats next month.
I would say at least a monkey eases the pain but £500 or £10k pkg not really comparable.
See ya HU next time!
0 ·
Comments
Hi Hurst,
I have amended your post slightly to delete the name of the offending railer as naming and shaming is against forum rules. I have forwarded a copy of your original post onto the Sky poker team so they are aware of what happened. I hope that this doesn't spoil your enjoyment of this great game and that you try again next time to get to Vegas.
Sky Mod4
I only railed the action from the FT, so ofc don't have a solid read on terral, however he didn't seem like someone who would put a large portion of his stack in jepordy for a 10k package with 78o....if he calls and looses then basically you and him were even in chips and he's esstentially gonna be flipping for that seat.
Just my read, could be totally wrong (usually am tbf).
Never seen that in chat before..unless the hand involved TK or Orford obv. I just thought he was joking tbf, though if you think he was trying to influence the play then I can understand why you'd be upset...
Take it easy pal...GL in March
xx
One of the good things about this site IMO is that railers can chat and support their mates in the chat box even at crucial points in games and I would not like to see this changed personally but you have to draw a line somewhere and this kind of action crosses that line.
Better luck next time m8 Ray
Is this the so called offender hurst?????
He was chip leader with 5 left, and 4x raised/stacked off for 15k with King 5 suited claiming he was "committed" when lying 1st/5 in a "top 2" sattellite".
Someone in Vegas is going to get the "golden seat" on his left - hope it's coxy. lol.
Only the man himself will know if the chat influenced his decision. Maybe he can comment.......
The stacks as far as i recall did not warrant an automatic call. In fact, even in a standard sng this would be a fold imho. But fair play to terrell, its not his fault and very well done to him and coxy.
Commiserations Hursty, I know you will bounce back, you played a great game and did not deserve this. I thought you would bink a package, and i cant imagine how sick you feel this morning.
Whether the "call call call" influenced the decision is not the issue really, its that that player should know better! Much better, and at the very least he should apologise to Hursty privatly and explain his actions.
Is it a rule though?
Things like this just aren't clear - and they should be.
If you're leaving things down to "common sense" or "conscience", when it comes to £10,000 prizes, these soon go out of the window.
It is a rule in live poker that you must not talk about a hand while it is in progress and you must not influence a player who is in a hand when you are not.
However any spectator can shout call, call, call as basically he doesn't know or suggest anything about the cards the guy is holding, if he were to shout "call if you have a pair, or call if you have an ace" I think it would be taken more as "influencing" a player.
I do agree it was inappropriate to put what he did in the chat box and the vast majority of us in there were letting the players play without any sort of message to them other than good luck wishes, I wouldn't have made that call after the jam, I think the jam from Hursty was a very good play and if I had my hand in the cookie jar with 78 there I would have folded but only one person knows if the rail influenced the call, I suspect not but that isn't the point, agree that chat needs to be disabled to observers in all in situations
Dave
However reading from my understanding even a spectator influencing a desision is bad ettiquite (spelling).
I know in a number of events i play in, as a spetator you are requested not to speak during hand and expessially just an all in situation. I got a warning at a live game not that long ago actually. My mate goes all in, hes UTG with about 6BB, (everyone was 3-14BB with one guy as huge chip leader, the chip leader was on other table) i shouted nothing more than "c'mon Daz" which i dont think effects any desision what so ever. But i was kindly asked not to do it again, and if i did do it again i wouldnt be allowed in the card room.
Ok so that was a pretty strict event and was also on the bubble although the stakes where hugely different. £20 for the first guy that didnt bubble i think.
Looking at this situation though i think theres alot more to it than wht ive read so i cant really comment. However in my experiance if it has influenced the desision of the player surely that counts as 2 people playing the cards? Which i know is against the rules everywhere. I maybe wrong.
Id like to see a comment from sky to be honest.
vwp sir, hope you run good next time.
unlucky to bubble, must be a sick feeling in a tourney for Vegas..anyways i think chat should be banned when a player goes all-in then there cant be an issue as above happening. just out of interest, does this boarder on collusion???
all the best for your next attempt.
I am certain that you will bounce back from last nights incident and there will soon be a Vegas ticket with your name on it.
If the person (I've no idea who it was) who typed 'call, call, call' is a friend of someone at the final table who wasn't in the hand and stood to gain if there was an elimination then this is very unsavoury. Even if they're not it's still terrible etiquette. Hursty has every reason to feel the way he does. It's too late to do anything about this now, we'll never know if the decision to call was infuenced, but action could and should be taken to stop this happening again in the future. I hope the person involved is ashamed and an apology will be forthcoming.