Been having a think about combo perms to try and get good coverage weighted towards more likely (or favoured) selections. Above is not in selection priority order but I am thinking if it was, something like below:
e.g.
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 1
12, 12, 1, 12, 1, 12 16
13, 13, 1, 13, 1, 13 16
1, 12, 12, 1, 12, 1 8
12, 1, 1, 12, 1, 12 8
123,12 ,12, 1, 1 123 36
13,123, 1, 1, 12, 123 36
12, 12, 2, 123, 2, 12 24
Total = 145 lines £14.50
I probably need to play a few tunes on it and each time it would depend on no. runners and shape of each individual race but after a few more practice attempts I might give something like this a try.
Been having a think about combo perms to try and get good coverage weighted towards more likely (or favoured) selections. Above is not in selection priority order but I am thinking if it was, something like below: e.g. 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 1 12, 12, 1, 12, 1, 12 16 13, 13, 1, 13, 1, 13 16 1, 12, 12, 1, 12, 1 8 12, 1, 1, 12, 1, 12 8 123,12 ,12, 1, 1 123 36 13,123, 1, 1, 12, 123 36 12, 12, 2, 123, 2, 12 24 Total = 145 lines £14.50 I probably need to play a few tunes on it and each time it would depend on no. runners and shape of each individual race but after a few more practice attempts I might give something like this a try. Posted by Phantom66
Hi Phantom, I definitely think you are barking up the right type of tree with this concept.
I'm giving myself a bit of a break after all the exertions of the last few racing days, but if you are interested, a bit later, I can post what I consider to be +ev perm structures for Placepots.
It would work under a proviso of splitting each race into a "type" ie:
NOT VERY COMPETITIVE (Just a few fancied runners and short priced favourite)
COMPETITIVE (Fairly open affair, say 3/1, 7/2 fav ish)
VERY COMPETITIVE (Usually races where the favourite is > 5/1)
I often find that the best type of cards for Placepots have around two of each of the above category.
Let me know if you are interested in my perm structures for Placepots and I will document them and post on this thread.
I took a look at the Carlisle card and it sets up nice to be a test case, so please see spreadsheet below: I will add my horses for the A's, B's, C's etc. shortly
Please bear in mind that I am doing this purely as a statistical exercise, I haven't looked at a single piece of horse form, I am making my selections based upon the proviso that each horses odds accurately reflect it's chance.
In reality you would assess your opinion of their chances, although I do actually believe that a profit can be made without even looking at any form. (I am sure that statement will meet with some criticism)
Each perm is 72 lines, so at 10p would be £7.20 * 6 = £43.20 or at 5p (in shop) would cost £21.60
Please note that in the "VERY COMPETITIVE" races, I have moved away from the first few in the betting.
I'm hoping to get the "RP Favourites", the likes of WEST DRIVE (5/1 Fav) beat in the 3.00PM and CARNAGIO (6/1 Fav), GEORGIAN BAY (7/1 Joint 2nd Fav) and GORING (7/1 Joint 2nd Fav) beat in the 3.30PM.
This is because they are likely to be over-represented in the pool, while the 8/1 to 14/1 bracket are likely to be under-represented.
Of course when the "RP Favourites" DO place in these tough handicaps, it lowers the dividend AND I won't have them in my perm so it's a double negative, but if they do get beat, it is a double positive, as one is likely to still be in where a lot of people would have gone out, which means you give yourself the potential to win when it's a high dividend.
We'll see how it goes. I will amend would be selections before the off, based on non-runners and market moves, but I won't look at any form. I will the do a separate list of A's B's and C's (using same perm strategy) but using people's NAP selections. So it will be a fun exercise of pure statistics v form analysis/statistics combo.
Comments
I took a look at the Carlisle card and it sets up nice to be a test case, so please see spreadsheet below: I will add my horses for the A's, B's, C's etc. shortly
Please bear in mind that I am doing this purely as a statistical exercise, I haven't looked at a single piece of horse form, I am making my selections based upon the proviso that each horses odds accurately reflect it's chance.
In reality you would assess your opinion of their chances, although I do actually believe that a profit can be made without even looking at any form. (I am sure that statement will meet with some criticism)
Each perm is 72 lines, so at 10p would be £7.20 * 6 = £43.20 or at 5p (in shop) would cost £21.60
Cheers,
G
Here is my A,B.C,D,E and F's. (Based solely on their odds/market position without looking at any form).
AMENDED AT 1.55PM based on market moves:
Cheers,
G
I'm hoping to get the "RP Favourites", the likes of WEST DRIVE (5/1 Fav) beat in the 3.00PM and CARNAGIO (6/1 Fav), GEORGIAN BAY (7/1 Joint 2nd Fav) and GORING (7/1 Joint 2nd Fav) beat in the 3.30PM.
This is because they are likely to be over-represented in the pool, while the 8/1 to 14/1 bracket are likely to be under-represented.
Of course when the "RP Favourites" DO place in these tough handicaps, it lowers the dividend AND I won't have them in my perm so it's a double negative, but if they do get beat, it is a double positive, as one is likely to still be in where a lot of people would have gone out, which means you give yourself the potential to win when it's a high dividend.
We'll see how it goes. I will amend would be selections before the off, based on non-runners and market moves, but I won't look at any form. I will the do a separate list of A's B's and C's (using same perm strategy) but using people's NAP selections. So it will be a fun exercise of pure statistics v form analysis/statistics combo.
Hope this is of use anyway.
Cheers,
G